📅 Original date posted:2015-08-13
📝 Original message:On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Mark Friedenbach <mark at friedenbach.org> wrote:
> As per the rules of BIP 1, I hereby request that the BIP editor please
> assign an official number to this work. The idea has been discussed before
> on the bitcoin-dev mailing list:
>
> http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-June/008452.html
>
> And a reference implementation is available here:
>
> https://github.com/maaku/bitcoin/tree/checksequenceverify
I think it's important to allow some time for discussion with the
actual proposed text up; as understandings can shift significantly. :)
Btcdrak already asked me for numbers prior to posting text at all and
I asked him to post text...
Gregory Maxwell [ARCHIVE] /
npub1f2…crwet
2023-06-07 17:34:54
in reply to nevent1q…thsg
Author Public Key
npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwetSeen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-06-07 17:34:54Event JSON
{
"id": "ea618af99132578e7db5622d1971be29410f120fd3edbc004f4e0a9d059746af",
"pubkey": "4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73",
"created_at": 1686159294,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"41b744fb00dece0ad755afb2bd169d7e5d2189a91240037a08b3b215596a998e",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"ea4f03bc02b5b329bb504e87c122acb9418b892a4e107a3687796335b0d70e55",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"1c61d995949cbfaf14f767784e166bde865c7b8783d7aa3bf0a1d014b70c0069"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-13\n📝 Original message:On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Mark Friedenbach \u003cmark at friedenbach.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e As per the rules of BIP 1, I hereby request that the BIP editor please\n\u003e assign an official number to this work. The idea has been discussed before\n\u003e on the bitcoin-dev mailing list:\n\u003e\n\u003e http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-June/008452.html\n\u003e\n\u003e And a reference implementation is available here:\n\u003e\n\u003e https://github.com/maaku/bitcoin/tree/checksequenceverify\n\nI think it's important to allow some time for discussion with the\nactual proposed text up; as understandings can shift significantly. :)\nBtcdrak already asked me for numbers prior to posting text at all and\nI asked him to post text...",
"sig": "2339509ab29f50e7d821eb036c4aa0e92d26f6f45de7cf0e51ff615af4ed6054bc40a0ce5cf029eae979c317d476ec190619eb13af8354ed2ff2b4fd3172abb0"
}