📅 Original date posted:2017-09-07
📝 Original message:On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 11:51:45PM +0200, Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> This is not a priority, not very important either.
> Right now it is possible to create 0-value outputs that are spendable
> and thus stay in the utxo (potentially forever). Requiring at least 1
> satoshi per output doesn't really do much against a spam attack to the
> utxo, but I think it would be slightly better than the current
> situation.
Given that this has a very minimal cost for spammers - just a single satoshi -
I don't think this is worth the risk of making future upgrades more complex as
other posters have brought up.
Secondly, I think we have good reason to think that things like my own TXO
commitments and Bram's related work will make UTXO growth a non-issue in the
future.
So, I'd NACK such a proposal myself.
--
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170907/da9b038a/attachment-0001.sig>;
Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] /
npub1m2…a2np2
2023-06-07 18:05:26
in reply to nevent1q…y29c
Author Public Key
npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2Published at
2023-06-07 18:05:26Event JSON
{
"id": "ea8924256c77ad956139a4c120977c7693f9dab51aa17bf82933da892a293c70",
"pubkey": "daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa",
"created_at": 1686161126,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"413baa220fa53193ec24f7b2af5b62e55b6671426a96b98b656e438fd923e071",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"0a58f1cb3b1800565fe1c1fb82fbd710d22ee540b2859c16e976082f1d403219",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"46986f86b97cc97829a031b03209644d134b939d0163375467f0b1363e0d875e"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2017-09-07\n📝 Original message:On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 11:51:45PM +0200, Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e This is not a priority, not very important either.\n\u003e Right now it is possible to create 0-value outputs that are spendable\n\u003e and thus stay in the utxo (potentially forever). Requiring at least 1\n\u003e satoshi per output doesn't really do much against a spam attack to the\n\u003e utxo, but I think it would be slightly better than the current\n\u003e situation.\n\nGiven that this has a very minimal cost for spammers - just a single satoshi -\nI don't think this is worth the risk of making future upgrades more complex as\nother posters have brought up.\n\nSecondly, I think we have good reason to think that things like my own TXO\ncommitments and Bram's related work will make UTXO growth a non-issue in the\nfuture.\n\nSo, I'd NACK such a proposal myself.\n\n-- \nhttps://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 455 bytes\nDesc: Digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170907/da9b038a/attachment-0001.sig\u003e",
"sig": "486974b8b261a7973ff1f729e1242a140f9f2c09187184a0e8614d0f7523d7ebe35857b61fb65df670ec6e2dcc7fc954b0a2d3b278ed52d00b88d2fac3e8d531"
}