jimbocoin on Nostr: BTW, I am not personally in favor of a block size decrease. The risk of a failed soft ...
BTW, I am not personally in favor of a block size decrease. The risk of a failed soft fork is not worth it.
I’m just saying that if people were serious about combatting spam, the path is to make block space so valuable that spam isn’t worth it. That means constraining block size to increase fees.
Published at
2025-05-09 00:27:46Event JSON
{
"id": "e57e6dc686efbaf438a66ab4bf7e6dd84c641fd7d9afc024cde2c9163f21eef6",
"pubkey": "6140478c9ae12f1d0b540e7c57806649327a91b040b07f7ba3dedc357cab0da5",
"created_at": 1746750466,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"53e788b643344c840d475596be902e661c7969e2f08c9a185f044f751cc5bda7",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"96c87765d900b169f5fdd8bc19bf97bd8c6d163ff416a89d45cbb7cac48c9433"
]
],
"content": "BTW, I am not personally in favor of a block size decrease. The risk of a failed soft fork is not worth it.\n\nI’m just saying that if people were serious about combatting spam, the path is to make block space so valuable that spam isn’t worth it. That means constraining block size to increase fees.",
"sig": "9c3caa7f2f122c0542ee304c85324f607478a8332db84276dca4488f146e54d2c1e7de6f9f2dfc045de65b38f117278b0e30ec73bef0a29aa75ceda3653eb4e9"
}
