📅 Original date posted:2019-02-19
📝 Original message:On Thursday 13 December 2018 12:32:44 Johnson Lau via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> While this seems fully compatible with eltoo, is there any other proposals
> require NOINPUT, and is adversely affected by either way of tagging?
Yes, this seems to break the situation where a wallet wants to use NOINPUT for
everything, including normal L1 payments. For example, in the scenario where
address reuse will be rejected/ignored by the recipient unconditionally, and
the payee is considered to have burned their bitcoins by attempting it.
Luke
Luke Dashjr [ARCHIVE] /
npub1tf…rfq0n
2023-06-07 18:16:15
in reply to nevent1q…2lws
Author Public Key
npub1tfk373zg9dnmtvxnpnq7s2dkdgj37rwfj3yrwld7830qltmv8qps8rfq0nPublished at
2023-06-07 18:16:15Event JSON
{
"id": "e55c5444c12910bb379a1f1ba2bc54a55c9d5a3ff256c37bf73f0ef4fe3e7d2b",
"pubkey": "5a6d1f44482b67b5b0d30cc1e829b66a251f0dc99448377dbe3c5e0faf6c3803",
"created_at": 1686161775,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"d115c2cf2fc1879f7295a540eec6df49284da7ea0208c40bff09a5bb6df1c817",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"17eb68a1f3ab28d2c7c9e78de1a43db64b330ce3b119fba2d2addd60e6634ab0",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"492fa402e838904bdc8eb2c8fafa1aa895df26438bfd998c71b01cb9db550ff7"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2019-02-19\n📝 Original message:On Thursday 13 December 2018 12:32:44 Johnson Lau via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e While this seems fully compatible with eltoo, is there any other proposals\n\u003e require NOINPUT, and is adversely affected by either way of tagging?\n\nYes, this seems to break the situation where a wallet wants to use NOINPUT for \neverything, including normal L1 payments. For example, in the scenario where \naddress reuse will be rejected/ignored by the recipient unconditionally, and \nthe payee is considered to have burned their bitcoins by attempting it.\n\nLuke",
"sig": "743a98fd6f8a0ea388c560271fab8ba50864c71722b47e6d5dd438ef6c4d9a5e4e3028078bcfc427d5b08a88b243111e84717b9f1a9de0c58ea847cd9757ef66"
}