Yes, this is virtually identical to Carvalho’s proposal, except I believe better mainly due to:
* easier route to adoption for both developers and users due to the relatively pristine ‘bits’ moniker
* no need to spend time refuting BIP176 as this obviously supersedes that proposal
* though we can’t predict the names that users will actually use, IMO ‘bits’ seems more likely to be what’s adopted in real world use than ‘bitcoin’
aidan
npub1n2…l5j65
2025-01-04 13:03:09
in reply to nevent1q…s6k5
Author Public Key
npub1n2vwvkepru9y2kuxnmsxamp2nxeyx9wwdpznphz70kucn8ak0r3s0l5j65Published at
2025-01-04 13:03:09Event JSON
{
"id": "e79b4ec97ade3d65792a059a24ab18a9ab0e30239ca7dd83f427fd4a917dc71b",
"pubkey": "9a98e65b211f0a455b869ee06eec2a99b24315ce684530dc5e7db9899fb678e3",
"created_at": 1735995789,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"4c5b58e8da5d35afd7fd2b2d6b0d31cb671754d7423fc6e97cc551b4ac6cf442",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"7effe4715a298567d6aed2f6a24bb99499892ada59c84b488fbb294631ee6575",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"b481d853bdd549c8cad18dcc1fb1fc8dba6e96b60278fcec388bb15967f95a2d"
]
],
"content": "Yes, this is virtually identical to Carvalho’s proposal, except I believe better mainly due to:\n\n* easier route to adoption for both developers and users due to the relatively pristine ‘bits’ moniker\n* no need to spend time refuting BIP176 as this obviously supersedes that proposal\n* though we can’t predict the names that users will actually use, IMO ‘bits’ seems more likely to be what’s adopted in real world use than ‘bitcoin’",
"sig": "81b6ad264d05eb5e51f66de7fde3550aab24017c7cb236c9fb9cce916542bd8871f975d54bde8675ccd2ce6b84eb35d125476e7084e59d21ac95fffb7be3d0fe"
}