đ
Original date posted:2015-07-18
đ Original message:
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Nick ODell <nickodell at gmail.com> wrote:
> There doesn't seem to be any deployment timeline.
>
Welcome to bitcoin development.
At the moment we have only the capability to push out one soft fork vote at
a time. The uncontroversial aspects of BIP62 were rushed out as BIP66 in
response to an undisclosed vulnerability, as mentioned. I believe there is
consensus now that BIP65: CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY has higher deployment
priority, so it will be next. There is no deployment timeline for BIP62
because it is a low priority in this soft-fork logjam.
As to BIP62 being out of date, can you point to specific things? They'll
get fixed.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20150718/2d3ce21e/attachment.html>;
Mark Friedenbach [ARCHIVE] /
npub1r3âŚ48d0u
2023-06-09 12:43:41
in reply to nevent1qâŚzl07
Author Public Key
npub1r3san9v5njl6798hvauyu9ntm6r9c7u8s0t65wls58gpfdcvqp5sa48d0uPublished at
2023-06-09 12:43:41Event JSON
{
"id": "c2375ffaf83b1512ecb2258f3e3a72f6cf3e1dca8792e3deadd3340d6039fd26",
"pubkey": "1c61d995949cbfaf14f767784e166bde865c7b8783d7aa3bf0a1d014b70c0069",
"created_at": 1686314621,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"a859dce2c9cc841a5be8294d50ac395dcd85f4a25bee712ee1cc23781bfb221c",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"17719cad4525401842a8ff7e5af8f51c5f61ce46e987dabd509871c8912870e6",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"2a9b7d3423041901b738be6b1d40a6e4dd3f9041e7a5fa4a2d3c662d296814c7"
]
],
"content": "đ
Original date posted:2015-07-18\nđ Original message:\nOn Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Nick ODell \u003cnickodell at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e There doesn't seem to be any deployment timeline.\n\u003e\n\nWelcome to bitcoin development.\n\nAt the moment we have only the capability to push out one soft fork vote at\na time. The uncontroversial aspects of BIP62 were rushed out as BIP66 in\nresponse to an undisclosed vulnerability, as mentioned. I believe there is\nconsensus now that BIP65: CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY has higher deployment\npriority, so it will be next. There is no deployment timeline for BIP62\nbecause it is a low priority in this soft-fork logjam.\n\nAs to BIP62 being out of date, can you point to specific things? They'll\nget fixed.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20150718/2d3ce21e/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "43ef5b1470f1da7d810273135bb8949c7b98fbed6abf4cba8c2c6acfad8a0f8a415948d2e677af007208cfde8162c48d8555e01a38c046995a0be2f06b4fa88d"
}