📅 Original date posted:2014-04-23
📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 04/23/2014 06:15 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
> But I also agree with Gavin that the bitcoin-development email list
> is a perfectly good place to have these types of discussions. I
> myself have used it repeatedly to publish ideas specifically due to
> wide readership and multiple independent archives.
A development list is a great place to decide how to implement a
technical feature, one that feature has been deemed desirable.
The chief scientist has a platform via which he can publicly announce
proposed protocol changes. Anyone else could do the same.
There are conference happening all the time where people can announce
ideas like this, to give time for the community to hear the idea and
generate feedback.
There is absolutely nothing so urgent about this attack that requires
the consensus process to start here, in a place that most Bitcoin
users don't even know about and wouldn't even know which search terms
to apply to look for such a discussion if they did.
>> PS: We don't even know who runs BitUndo. They seem to have lots
>> of money to spend on web design - I wonder where it came from?
>
> Actually we do: Eric Springer
>
> See
>
> http://www.coindesk.com/double-spending-unconfirmed-transactions-concern-bitcoin/
>
> https://github.com/espringe - joined Feb 11 2010
>
> Anyway that's just twitter bootstrap or something; I hear the
> wizards can pump out a site like that in a few hours.
>
I stand corrected.
- --
Support online privacy by using email encryption whenever possible.
Learn how here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bakOKJFtB-k
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTWARRAAoJECoisBQbQ4v08kkIAKMSSCn9mBCMj6RwWHK6abud
UlaKOAh4LNAaJ+pIQD103EGH3JE9pzeaDouupTbdIHqb8CxVO3dn9UFXdfkDW1cf
YsOOfE0N5crfaODd+NU6jjaf5jXOgmT2ibCU3sSjmphDBMstZfrSaCljtyaj290Y
urnW1pdL5ZA0zLAUjNO2kXSbuHaE3CTz72s4dWsiRBsQLVAD8j5C5o8gxFVeZd7s
Ba4yGtGAsd0HWikUjE2L4G/J8RzbxUrm5w31A4lawkF+SqtJcFiwoxrXX+FVdi/8
rfAY/l0EBoRrkW+cajcj29eq1eOOIER0Zcu2FzpPc45Xywh9RCh8C3zgWitOvcI=
=IR+Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0x1B438BF4.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 21191 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140423/bf90e17d/attachment.bin>;
Justus Ranvier [ARCHIVE] /
npub1k2…9qd6m
2023-06-07 15:19:31
in reply to nevent1q…wqde
Author Public Key
npub1k2eekmevs6gg60df75qpjw4a2atmy89vx28c8zqq5jxy64tuzrws39qd6mPublished at
2023-06-07 15:19:31Event JSON
{
"id": "c26841dc2fade44416bd7f05442725d624f823998af2735dd83bfedca89a253c",
"pubkey": "b2b39b6f2c86908d3da9f500193abd5757b21cac328f838800a48c4d557c10dd",
"created_at": 1686151171,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"5090665aad23a77b012135979db1e16bc811db23aa511d1ac7d17a56045795a8",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"301460d67f3a09eaa1aa70127591fad4ec681316311c6983ee113058c25b862e",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-04-23\n📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----\nHash: SHA1\n\nOn 04/23/2014 06:15 PM, Peter Todd wrote:\n\n\u003e But I also agree with Gavin that the bitcoin-development email list\n\u003e is a perfectly good place to have these types of discussions. I\n\u003e myself have used it repeatedly to publish ideas specifically due to\n\u003e wide readership and multiple independent archives.\n\nA development list is a great place to decide how to implement a\ntechnical feature, one that feature has been deemed desirable.\n\nThe chief scientist has a platform via which he can publicly announce\nproposed protocol changes. Anyone else could do the same.\n\nThere are conference happening all the time where people can announce\nideas like this, to give time for the community to hear the idea and\ngenerate feedback.\n\nThere is absolutely nothing so urgent about this attack that requires\nthe consensus process to start here, in a place that most Bitcoin\nusers don't even know about and wouldn't even know which search terms\nto apply to look for such a discussion if they did.\n\n\u003e\u003e PS: We don't even know who runs BitUndo. They seem to have lots\n\u003e\u003e of money to spend on web design - I wonder where it came from?\n\u003e \n\u003e Actually we do: Eric Springer\n\u003e \n\u003e See\n\u003e \n\u003e http://www.coindesk.com/double-spending-unconfirmed-transactions-concern-bitcoin/\n\u003e\n\u003e https://github.com/espringe - joined Feb 11 2010\n\u003e \n\u003e Anyway that's just twitter bootstrap or something; I hear the\n\u003e wizards can pump out a site like that in a few hours.\n\u003e \n\nI stand corrected.\n\n- -- \nSupport online privacy by using email encryption whenever possible.\nLearn how here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bakOKJFtB-k\n-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\nVersion: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)\nComment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/\n\niQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTWARRAAoJECoisBQbQ4v08kkIAKMSSCn9mBCMj6RwWHK6abud\nUlaKOAh4LNAaJ+pIQD103EGH3JE9pzeaDouupTbdIHqb8CxVO3dn9UFXdfkDW1cf\nYsOOfE0N5crfaODd+NU6jjaf5jXOgmT2ibCU3sSjmphDBMstZfrSaCljtyaj290Y\nurnW1pdL5ZA0zLAUjNO2kXSbuHaE3CTz72s4dWsiRBsQLVAD8j5C5o8gxFVeZd7s\nBa4yGtGAsd0HWikUjE2L4G/J8RzbxUrm5w31A4lawkF+SqtJcFiwoxrXX+FVdi/8\nrfAY/l0EBoRrkW+cajcj29eq1eOOIER0Zcu2FzpPc45Xywh9RCh8C3zgWitOvcI=\n=IR+Y\n-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: 0x1B438BF4.asc\nType: application/pgp-keys\nSize: 21191 bytes\nDesc: not available\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140423/bf90e17d/attachment.bin\u003e",
"sig": "a415923ed489166b782034d06c3e41e62425ec722535d33e29df357ba26c76c7e05bbfa3b1dc9514dd8351ec2f16d6de52fbb67862900e5241a2d1e35d1eab5d"
}