Even at its peak, the entire income per month at CoffeeGeek was around $7,000 a month. Back then, expenditures were around $6,000 a month. Still not enough to buy equipment for reviews. So we came up with a contract for anyone providing equipment for review. It clearly stated the supplier had no input into the editorial content, and there are no guarantees the product reviews positively.
Vendors got a) exclusive URL links, and b) 3 mentions in review. That was it. Manufacturers, even less.
/6
CoffeeGeek /
npub12m…xva2j
2024-01-03 23:27:59
in reply to nevent1q…nypu
Author Public Key
npub12mg6t9lzyhy8mmtd2048p6kzxg2x4d9c5p94ct4unv4heuutcrysgxva2jSeen on
wss://relay.noswhere.comPublished at
2024-01-03 23:27:59Event JSON
{
"id": "c23f73011a28b1a5a75a7cde6d4569e7935b0539e633d640f5623f179c771928",
"pubkey": "56d1a597e225c87ded6d53ea70eac232146ab4b8a04b5c2ebc9b2b7cf38bc0c9",
"created_at": 1704324479,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"23770042e9a7a18ed713652993842cfcf7423c17fcdcf008d34693b141c0dcda",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://flipboard.social/users/coffeegeek/statuses/111694609090037054",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "Even at its peak, the entire income per month at CoffeeGeek was around $7,000 a month. Back then, expenditures were around $6,000 a month. Still not enough to buy equipment for reviews. So we came up with a contract for anyone providing equipment for review. It clearly stated the supplier had no input into the editorial content, and there are no guarantees the product reviews positively.\n\nVendors got a) exclusive URL links, and b) 3 mentions in review. That was it. Manufacturers, even less.\n\n/6",
"sig": "90fb0496bebb6d779f54f6c243d900b9918fbe03f415647271dcd0be715c5488ee3fc199a0bcf5edad944f9fb8cdd595b3fa0c5f7b7638504d4b30ca8c22b6ae"
}