📅 Original date posted:2014-07-28
📝 Original message:On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Robert McKay <robert at mckay.com> wrote:
> I don't think Sybil attack is the right term for this.. there is only
> one IP address.. one "identity".
The bitcoin protocol is more or less identityless. It's using up lots
of network capacity, "number of sockets" is as pretty close as you
get.
> I'm not even sure that this behaviour can be considered abuse.. it's
> pretty much following the rules and maybe even improving the transaction
> and block propagation.
It isn't relaying transactions or blocks as far as anyone with a
connection to it can tell.
and sure, probably not much to worry about— people have been running
spy nodes for a long time, at least that much is not new.
Gregory Maxwell [ARCHIVE] /
npub1f2…crwet
2023-06-07 15:24:32
in reply to nevent1q…tjl6
Author Public Key
npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwetSeen on
wss://relay.noswhere.comPublished at
2023-06-07 15:24:32Event JSON
{
"id": "c704dfd0e395de62487d18e1e9fd7c1f46913f2e09ed24bb0d279984a82a8f41",
"pubkey": "4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73",
"created_at": 1686151472,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"556378d03a8e62c4388c049b5fe0908804bedabb839e44fa587da4e1fcf8b478",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"12ee9e0f695ddc3720d13dae1239028b3c942676869bd5bd064dd65261a95e5b",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"5ea1cbeab9d50021496bba53fd43b1c7501d58bc84cd506595942424f8dc69c3"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-07-28\n📝 Original message:On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Robert McKay \u003crobert at mckay.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e I don't think Sybil attack is the right term for this.. there is only\n\u003e one IP address.. one \"identity\".\n\nThe bitcoin protocol is more or less identityless. It's using up lots\nof network capacity, \"number of sockets\" is as pretty close as you\nget.\n\n\u003e I'm not even sure that this behaviour can be considered abuse.. it's\n\u003e pretty much following the rules and maybe even improving the transaction\n\u003e and block propagation.\n\nIt isn't relaying transactions or blocks as far as anyone with a\nconnection to it can tell.\n\nand sure, probably not much to worry about— people have been running\nspy nodes for a long time, at least that much is not new.",
"sig": "11de0e5130a9109bdccc0f47d4e6b150c6a48b84ebd8eaa02d1645d64730eeb1f910e60c6518f7476cce49d0733226078b42180d6a7cd3748598836a0546d7e5"
}