schmijos on Nostr: This make me thing about dynamic programming languages. I listened to this podcast ...
This make me thing about dynamic programming languages. I listened to this podcast with Steven Baker (
https://open.spotify.com/episode/5X55PoHg5lhLUH7Z0IzUe7). Around 1:09 he talks about the runtime overservability of Ruby and Smalltalk.
Static language proponents live in a deterministic Matrix. They have to live with what they are. The are „human“. Dynamic language proponents live in a way more inspectable Matrix. They live with how something something behaves. They behave human.
A follow-up thought: would the agents be possible in one or the other? Would Neo be possible in one or the other?
In the matrix, nothing is verifiable.
Published at
2025-05-03 06:58:53Event JSON
{
"id": "c752c21ffd37f8653536c2e811b105bf757dff7d0bf4718e75671a01b3ffe716",
"pubkey": "e989aa6e0137d52a410ecd89ae59f7adbfb0bdec9786b9181c3707954b4cfa69",
"created_at": 1746255533,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"16d76f262b689bb1a33faa2df954dbe7ac717937fad4765a05ddfae3dac92856"
],
[
"p",
"16d76f262b689bb1a33faa2df954dbe7ac717937fad4765a05ddfae3dac92856"
],
[
"r",
"https://open.spotify.com/episode/5X55PoHg5lhLUH7Z0IzUe7"
]
],
"content": "This make me thing about dynamic programming languages. I listened to this podcast with Steven Baker (https://open.spotify.com/episode/5X55PoHg5lhLUH7Z0IzUe7). Around 1:09 he talks about the runtime overservability of Ruby and Smalltalk.\n\nStatic language proponents live in a deterministic Matrix. They have to live with what they are. The are „human“. Dynamic language proponents live in a way more inspectable Matrix. They live with how something something behaves. They behave human.\n\nA follow-up thought: would the agents be possible in one or the other? Would Neo be possible in one or the other?\n\nnostr:note102c8jqzgwhcqj3a4tgu676m6n5cyph0eek583z9uhh36khj6gwxq823kep",
"sig": "2310e877f232f8b654dbbe37784a1b2a51770818fc549e8acc87973898eb5c41c51aa540c561019d6f844e5ae79cf0b6db0e6980c0010669ed4cc451ef09ed2b"
}
