Gavin [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2016-02-07 📝 Original message:> On Feb 7, 2016, at 2:27 ...
📅 Original date posted:2016-02-07
📝 Original message:> On Feb 7, 2016, at 2:27 PM, <jl2012 at xbt.hk> <jl2012 at xbt.hk> wrote:
>
> Normal version number only suggests softforks, which is usually not a concern for SPV clients.
Soft forks affect the security of low-confirmation (zero or one) transactions sent to SPV wallets even more than hard forks, and because many users and businesses choose convenience over airtight security I would argue transaction validation rule changes are a VERY big concern for lightweight clients.
Published at
2023-06-07 17:48:33Event JSON
{
"id": "c62bf4adb36a567f011aaefd230f173836f9f8e85f2b7f788d91897e3da635ba",
"pubkey": "4b1a5906489c6232556bd6a398a430750448185cee39bc8d0b764178775dc150",
"created_at": 1686160113,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"225bd65196e0b92a41e9e14e274e0ca016fd5fd1fb7ff068f7d16d873098abfe",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"838b41d8a82145fa9e446d946a87822978b4183440a9e716ad2275736532f938",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"b61e2e7ccbf4abd7f49715c62f4ac7a93cbdd5ead0316279c5f5fe9b18dd0aaa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2016-02-07\n📝 Original message:\u003e On Feb 7, 2016, at 2:27 PM, \u003cjl2012 at xbt.hk\u003e \u003cjl2012 at xbt.hk\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \n\u003e Normal version number only suggests softforks, which is usually not a concern for SPV clients.\n\nSoft forks affect the security of low-confirmation (zero or one) transactions sent to SPV wallets even more than hard forks, and because many users and businesses choose convenience over airtight security I would argue transaction validation rule changes are a VERY big concern for lightweight clients.",
"sig": "d4aaa83541b6be0715726baa39688b3197dc0608208c6e89d35af723c7f4a26def303160caf872f62253410eff45a4dc863e3c95bc640a2f5c90d79a799371b2"
}