Jim Phillips [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-08-07 📝 Original message:On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-08-07
📝 Original message:On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> But perhaps there is some "use" for ultra-low-priority unreliable
> transactions (... despite DoS attacks).
>
I can think of a variety of protocols that broadcast information and don't
really care about whether it gets delivered.. Think of everything that uses
UDP on TCP/IP. The most basic thing I can think of would be low-priority
notifications that are sent to the entire Bitcoin universe, but don't need
to persist. The protocol provides for a signed and thus verified message,
and a method for broadcasting it to every node that might be interested in
seeing it. If it never makes it into a block, so be it. If it does, so be
it.
--
*James G. Phillips IV*
<
https://plus.google.com/u/0/113107039501292625391/posts>
<
http://www.linkedin.com/in/ergophobe>
*"Don't bunt. Aim out of the ball park. Aim for the company of immortals."
-- David Ogilvy*
*This message was created with 100% recycled electrons. Please think twice
before printing.*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150807/c68218aa/attachment.html>
Published at
2023-06-07 15:46:10Event JSON
{
"id": "ce2559e11fa840cd82e4533c2cbdcf3272d28f8929d686d64e1116d225a90271",
"pubkey": "8b64be8dfcb19730f674fdb0169f772317a629f8dd3b8d925d342a0273bbb37b",
"created_at": 1686152770,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"cf6411bfecea99b0c4ea78e985838b5e3fd62429f4968960ffd260356286401f",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"fa6bdd660866e5ea78e586e5c13fc71c1a5bbda7d627901f7c2c07238e9b323a",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"33228a8ed797b24e872fc0257c1515fc9bca74c0b230dcbb7d3d2bd38fd97ed7"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-07\n📝 Original message:On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e\n\u003e But perhaps there is some \"use\" for ultra-low-priority unreliable\n\u003e transactions (... despite DoS attacks).\n\u003e\n\nI can think of a variety of protocols that broadcast information and don't\nreally care about whether it gets delivered.. Think of everything that uses\nUDP on TCP/IP. The most basic thing I can think of would be low-priority\nnotifications that are sent to the entire Bitcoin universe, but don't need\nto persist. The protocol provides for a signed and thus verified message,\nand a method for broadcasting it to every node that might be interested in\nseeing it. If it never makes it into a block, so be it. If it does, so be\nit.\n\n--\n*James G. Phillips IV*\n\u003chttps://plus.google.com/u/0/113107039501292625391/posts\u003e\n\u003chttp://www.linkedin.com/in/ergophobe\u003e\n\n*\"Don't bunt. Aim out of the ball park. Aim for the company of immortals.\"\n-- David Ogilvy*\n\n *This message was created with 100% recycled electrons. Please think twice\nbefore printing.*\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150807/c68218aa/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "3e7c45b9490da3b806e17fb94aab057906de0fbc720bdbd318584b40ea900ca4a8b85f36053a64f3bbe4a80dc83949c416cf5b1b62b838be343cd374e3e80e58"
}