Why Nostr? What is Njump?
2023-06-07 22:51:26
in reply to

eric at voskuil.org [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: šŸ“… Original date posted:2021-04-07 šŸ“ Original message:You may activate any time ...

šŸ“… Original date posted:2021-04-07
šŸ“ Original message:You may activate any time you want.



e



From: bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev-bounces at lists.linuxfoundation.org> On Behalf Of Claus Ehrenberg via bitcoin-dev
Sent: Wednesday, April 7, 2021 6:42 AM
To: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>; Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] March 23rd 2021 Taproot Activation Meeting Notes



As a user, I think it's very important for me to know if Taproot is eventually coming or not. So why not make it so that if _either_ miners _or_ users decide for Taproot, it will activate no matter what. Accepting a chain split is imo the fairest way to 'resolve the conflict' (it can't be resolved anyway).



That would probably mean running ST and and UASF concurrently.



The upside would be that we've got a safe date for Taproot, except neither users nor miners want it.



Cheers,

Claus

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20210407/dafd545f/attachment.html>;
Author Public Key
npub1r34khxrz9w39zpzezymqz04dcel95adfxf6qpjul9wdv2qn5vtps06s8vu