š
Original date posted:2017-04-08
š Original message:>
>
> No, it isn't allowed right now. Doing it wouldn't invalidate blocks, but it
> would clearly be an attack on the network and cause harm. The same as if
> miners were to maliciously mine only empty blocks.
>
>
What's your definition of "allowed" then? Because a miner definitely can
mine only empty blocks and a miner definitely can do overt ASICBoost (using
as little as 1 bit of the version field) right now. I thought you meant
allowed in the sense that if a block is allowed, it is a valid block on the
network. It sounds like you mean something else, perhaps, "a block is
allowed if it doesn't cause harm to the network." I'm not sure how you
quantify that as that seems pretty subjective.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170408/06b7adc0/attachment.html>;
Jimmy Song [ARCHIVE] /
npub17wā¦3nc05
2023-06-07 17:59:55
in reply to nevent1qā¦3eml
Author Public Key
npub17w8rw3wtcr03zdsdjhmcj37w0g6l79gsspleltsznexdktv0qw0qd3nc05Published at
2023-06-07 17:59:55Event JSON
{
"id": "c18daeea16c5ecb64a0c0644fa4c631f98e9ec3a5bb81ade0c923986532567c1",
"pubkey": "f38e3745cbc0df11360d95f78947ce7a35ff1510807f9fae029e4cdb2d8f039e",
"created_at": 1686160795,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"b3abda28c58fcdd36a7f3d79347d12387effc8cb5f326fca3c05e821d4348755",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"0603487472f8b3547f240db319c71e30119a6159443186382ab28dfb2a87f14c",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"5a6d1f44482b67b5b0d30cc1e829b66a251f0dc99448377dbe3c5e0faf6c3803"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2017-04-08\nš Original message:\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e No, it isn't allowed right now. Doing it wouldn't invalidate blocks, but it\n\u003e would clearly be an attack on the network and cause harm. The same as if\n\u003e miners were to maliciously mine only empty blocks.\n\u003e\n\u003e\nWhat's your definition of \"allowed\" then? Because a miner definitely can\nmine only empty blocks and a miner definitely can do overt ASICBoost (using\nas little as 1 bit of the version field) right now. I thought you meant\nallowed in the sense that if a block is allowed, it is a valid block on the\nnetwork. It sounds like you mean something else, perhaps, \"a block is\nallowed if it doesn't cause harm to the network.\" I'm not sure how you\nquantify that as that seems pretty subjective.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170408/06b7adc0/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "3f28e3f208b83ae3760b9c64561334a600e39556a128825bf14c35c26841992a3ba77db387c087d9cbb94b2b9d29a5853535c2ad211a17da3e1602d32f621353"
}