Philosophical and ideological debate tend to be a zero-sum game.
Most think that they can't be a capitalist and a communist at the same time. But I argue that we can have multiple different ideologies: we can be a communist with our family and a capitalist with strangers, for example.
Anyway, the point, I want to make is that a philosophical conversation is necessary at some level, but at a certain point, it becomes so useless that it distracts us from perusing what's necessary: solving hard problems.
Problems are inevitable. And problems are soluble.
So let's build the future once we have the foundation of basic principles.
bjunjo / Billy Jun Jo
npub195…xhsg3
2023-03-06 04:52:06
in reply to nevent1q…m7xn
Author Public Key
npub1959uhy6avua0j5x25y3szs9g604whnn0n47dqup7lkg7eq656ugqexhsg3Published at
2023-03-06 04:52:06Event JSON
{
"id": "c028f94b2dc6e7c1902ca8352c0d530b05744773a44c3682a02e2209317e1ccd",
"pubkey": "2d0bcb935d673af950caa1230140a8d3eaebce6f9d7cd0703efd91ec8354d710",
"created_at": 1678078326,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"51e33eda26c7058e01f6b3c00a7ecb2ec077cad357b782f4d8aacd3c7385f79c",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"2d0bcb935d673af950caa1230140a8d3eaebce6f9d7cd0703efd91ec8354d710"
]
],
"content": "Philosophical and ideological debate tend to be a zero-sum game. \n\nMost think that they can't be a capitalist and a communist at the same time. But I argue that we can have multiple different ideologies: we can be a communist with our family and a capitalist with strangers, for example. \n\nAnyway, the point, I want to make is that a philosophical conversation is necessary at some level, but at a certain point, it becomes so useless that it distracts us from perusing what's necessary: solving hard problems. \n\nProblems are inevitable. And problems are soluble. \n\nSo let's build the future once we have the foundation of basic principles.",
"sig": "c02e14b40199fae96dd1ff2d3edf08f411ed0504cfe5e56f64ec602c42e25fc11bd93eb365ac6189e1aea4d7056d427e98d23048a6ff303285a76ebbd22eb031"
}