š
Original date posted:2015-06-27
š Original message:On 6/27/2015 at 3:18 PM, "Greg Sanders" <gsanders87 at gmail.com> wrote:
>Can we agree n-1 dev Nacks would be a controversial hard fork?
That requires an assumption that all developers are perfectly representing the whole community.
And no shady lobbying behind the scenes too.
NxtChg [ARCHIVE] /
npub1ywā¦z8l47
2023-06-07 15:40:44
in reply to nevent1qā¦r3d8
Author Public Key
npub1yw9mz9gsrukq2seu9w9wljqw6k62l8fllpz8fzze673znzc3ddysaz8l47Published at
2023-06-07 15:40:44Event JSON
{
"id": "c09369a9ae83676293928ce6aedbef5d38703e9b4b9df250854c3264dc9d64c1",
"pubkey": "238bb115101f2c05433c2b8aefc80ed5b4af9d3ff844748859d7a2298b116b49",
"created_at": 1686152444,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"6b97b8772e4c3c0f5eb751746063b4217197a3eb7cab2fa3b16264082ad573c4",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"41cae083078909909a7955062025ff72bb3d157d9615b98e7337014256df85a3",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"937f10fc4f78d8676348562d9d886843fbb351d99d6c96423fe9970819962e19"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2015-06-27\nš Original message:On 6/27/2015 at 3:18 PM, \"Greg Sanders\" \u003cgsanders87 at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003eCan we agree n-1 dev Nacks would be a controversial hard fork?\n\nThat requires an assumption that all developers are perfectly representing the whole community.\n\nAnd no shady lobbying behind the scenes too.",
"sig": "21b970249cce82bf44cbd368de8fd43f8a776d99c940a8d1fd6d51cc3724f8ca45b223d48166aa0bb6214665f454f91e5d7b734d2da5afe61df6fc549143f9f7"
}