That one's not bad IMO. That's the Chinese existing unicode as opposed to a new unicode character the people behind that symbol idea are pushing for (all horizontal lines same width).
Problem is more people hate the original idea than like it, and of the people that like it seems that more are in favour of a new character than repurposing the Chinese one.
And to make it worse, there's another faction pushing for ≐ , also an existing unicode character.
Unresolvable mess.
Joe / Joe working on B2B
npub1hy…wtqnx
2025-05-19 15:10:03
in reply to nevent1q…7ksg
Author Public Key
npub1hyxredcavc6ruqgsf4wf4hmakpwnvefmzaspl7dja6a2sxlx0q3sxwtqnxPublished at
2025-05-19 15:10:03Event JSON
{
"id": "c989a51230bb13d5959cec6261c9c5081927a1709088ae377594bf27087f8307",
"pubkey": "b90c3cb71d66343e01104d5c9adf7db05d36653b17601ff9b2eebaa81be67823",
"created_at": 1747667403,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"aa552834675a68be9f8a8cc373feb12082cd247de461f7a1553d5d4ce1331a6a",
"wss://relay.damus.io",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"28d20b771294ae174617fc19440ba0d3e6bbb240adfeb47581d4987093b04a02",
"wss://relay.damus.io",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"b90c3cb71d66343e01104d5c9adf7db05d36653b17601ff9b2eebaa81be67823"
],
[
"p",
"dd1f9d502c7951df47e8f8ed245e8bfa24f7e82c28f19399a8f0e74b06113a21"
]
],
"content": "That one's not bad IMO. That's the Chinese existing unicode as opposed to a new unicode character the people behind that symbol idea are pushing for (all horizontal lines same width). \n\nProblem is more people hate the original idea than like it, and of the people that like it seems that more are in favour of a new character than repurposing the Chinese one. \n\nAnd to make it worse, there's another faction pushing for ≐ , also an existing unicode character. \n\nUnresolvable mess. ",
"sig": "5abaa94c532c3af73a157e2c834a9a9984bd0aa30e1908e88315a0a5688a6f32df9e18a5b8ba7165db563e94ed09c52675a605b7119f8b56aa9b19b74dcb727e"
}