---
1. False Equivalence as Emotional Bait
> "It would truly help if you could ALSO apply your philosophical thoughts equally to the genocide of Germans during World War II."
Tactic: Equating the Nazi-engineered Holocaust — a state-orchestrated genocide — with post-war German suffering, which, while real, was not genocide.
Fallacy: This is a false equivalence, often used to relativize Nazi crimes and inject moral confusion.
Purpose: To redirect the conversation away from accountability (Gaza, genocide) and shift sympathy to the perpetrators of the 20th century’s worst atrocity.
---
2. Holocaust Denial in Disguise
> "There was, of course, never any such thing as the Holocaust™."
Tactic: Soft-denial framed in sarcasm, de-legitimizing the Holocaust as a “trademarked” fiction.
Marker: Use of “™” implies the Holocaust is a brand, not a crime — a classic in antisemitic rhetoric.
Reality: The Holocaust is one of the most documented genocides in history — Nazi records, testimonies, photographs, camp remains, and even confessions by perpetrators confirm it.
> "Pack of lies... cloak Judaism with undeserved 'total innocence'..."
Goal: To resurrect the antisemitic trope that Jews manipulate historical narrative to gain power, immunity, and control — the exact script from The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
Conclusion: This isn’t historical inquiry — it’s accusatory mythology in service of bigotry.
---
3. Historical Inversion and Gaslighting
> "More Germans were killed after May 8, 1945..."
Distortion: While post-war suffering of Germans (expulsions, starvation) is documented, there is no evidence that it surpassed total German war casualties.
Gaslighting: It manipulates real suffering to negate Germany’s role as the aggressor and invert the perpetrator/victim dynamic.
> "More bombs were dropped on Berlin than the UK..."
Misleading framing: The Allied bombing campaign was horrific — but it was a military response to Nazi aggression, not genocide. The Blitz was offensive, the bombing of Berlin was retaliatory.
---
4. Weaponized Anti-Feminism and Conspiratorial Closure
> "Feminism was caused to suddenly burst onto the scene..."
Final move: The author links feminism to the aftermath of war, implying it’s a globalist plot to replace lost men — a biopolitical conspiracy theory wrapped in gendered paranoia.
Purpose: To complete the fascist circle — race, war, gender, and banking as a unifying conspiracy, replacing nuanced history with an ideological mythos.
---
Verdict:
This reply is not an appeal for balance or nuance. It is weaponized historical revisionism designed to:
Deny genocide
Shift guilt onto victims
Invoke antisemitic tropes
Obscure systemic violence
Vilify post-war progress
Its endgame is to absolve fascism by cloaking it in the grief of those who suffered its downfall, and then reframe history as a lie orchestrated by Jews, bankers, and feminists.
It must be rejected, not debated, because it is not a good faith argument. It is a gateway drug to fascism, dressed in the skin of “balanced historical perspective.”
Would you like a meme, social post, or graphic obliterating this reply?
quotingThe ongoing Genocide in Gaza has likely inspired this post. But it would truly help if you could ALSO apply your philosophical thoughts equally to the genocide of Germans during World War II. There was, of course, never any such thing as the Holocaust™. The pack of lies upon which that fiction has been built was created in order to cloak Judaism with an undeserved "total innocence" for inciting Europe to war during the 1930s, and to assist the future state of Israel (which they were already preparing to declare) by tailoring a protective cloak of censorship against future criticism.
nevent1q…2gj6
More Germans were killed, murdered, executed, tortured to death, after the 8th May 1945 (when the Surrender Docs were signed) than were lost in battle during the entire war period between 1st September 1939 and 7th May 1945.
And more bombs were dropped on the City of Berlin (alone) than were ever dropped upon the entire British Isles during the entirety of that Winston Churchill instigated conflict. So in reality, the Blitz on London was minuscule when compared to the flattening into rubble of almost every German city ... thus destroying or wiping-out 10,000 years of European history.
On top of which, your philosophy should also be publicly referred back to the madness of World War I, when millions of young men were murdered or injured beyond repair by Generals who must have been utterly insane to imagine that a conflict between two sides living like rats in mud-lined trenches could ever be called a war. That Banker-sponsored insanity literally wiped out almost an entire generation of Europe's finest men. A death toll from which Europe never recovered.
This is why Feminism was caused to suddenly burst onto the global scene (via America) just a couple of years after the Armistice.