š
Original date posted:2023-02-05
šļø Summary of this message: Using witness data can be cheaper than script pubkey for certain data sizes. Users should decide how to use OP_RETURN.
š Original message:On February 5, 2023 1:11:35 AM GMT+01:00, Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>Since bytes in the witness are cheaper than bytes in the script pubkey,
>there is a crossover point in data size where it will simply be cheaper to
>use witness data. Where that crossover point is depends on the finer
>details of the overhead of the two methods, but you could make some
>reasonable assumptions. Such a calculation could form the basis of a
>reasonable OP_RETURN proposal. I don't know if it would be persuasive, but
>it would at least be coherent.
I don't think it's worth the technical complexity trying to carefully argue a specific limit. Let users decide for themselves how they want to use OpReturn.
Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] /
npub1m2ā¦a2np2
2023-06-07 23:19:02
in reply to nevent1qā¦7ywr
Author Public Key
npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2Published at
2023-06-07 23:19:02Event JSON
{
"id": "cfb894429e67aac3ccc653c5731581f6543e81c00f49fdace07a9e0d0551a564",
"pubkey": "daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa",
"created_at": 1686179942,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"db7e30240de322a59459e6f6d735c7f019f73c8194514d70467812fbd7606451",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"8726c2e01da7c12182b1e3a778ba633716deb373e36bbd22e2ea7ad54a7dcdd6",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"6b8e77368804013d7126ba4b77c7963bcfeff909135791531097d7a0f03ca85d"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2023-02-05\nšļø Summary of this message: Using witness data can be cheaper than script pubkey for certain data sizes. Users should decide how to use OP_RETURN.\nš Original message:On February 5, 2023 1:11:35 AM GMT+01:00, Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003eSince bytes in the witness are cheaper than bytes in the script pubkey,\n\u003ethere is a crossover point in data size where it will simply be cheaper to\n\u003euse witness data. Where that crossover point is depends on the finer\n\u003edetails of the overhead of the two methods, but you could make some\n\u003ereasonable assumptions. Such a calculation could form the basis of a\n\u003ereasonable OP_RETURN proposal. I don't know if it would be persuasive, but\n\u003eit would at least be coherent.\n\nI don't think it's worth the technical complexity trying to carefully argue a specific limit. Let users decide for themselves how they want to use OpReturn.",
"sig": "68aca16d2a4f1866d9156d7446c5c32b3e30c48a2d75782b81f7a9134cdd46cd6727fa36caf0c3bb3eed52ee443a6c5fc0b0bf69630e1e62808902f7274a931c"
}