IDW on Nostr: Some argue that since miners can already include transactions with large OP-return ...
Some argue that since miners can already include transactions with large OP-return data fields we should remove the filter from nodes.
Instead I suggest we consider a consensus rule change (fork) to block miners from including large op-return transactions.
Published at
2025-05-03 00:39:34Event JSON
{
"id": "cb0b35d635615ba87b941da8f1fdf4f3ad7396bf963ac65b607287bb61340e96",
"pubkey": "cb2f4f62fe3ffe3cb6c82b70ca35dfb0aeb724375cb2916837af8ce65bc73c61",
"created_at": 1746232774,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"8269f4c80cbb25839fa2c65870ca08f0c1068504c38b837a12efce47e67db8b8",
"wss://relay.damus.io/",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"24e176c5d21bf2e3a9cf489214618fe572b3db88d090ad083989a02d87909223",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"5d160957c5c8e3a4ee7825e9eea7a5f3be25aa2b26f9ecf2a16ecc504365ae4b"
],
[
"p",
"74ffc51cc30150cf79b6cb316d3a15cf332ab29a38fec9eb484ab1551d6d1856"
]
],
"content": "Some argue that since miners can already include transactions with large OP-return data fields we should remove the filter from nodes.\nInstead I suggest we consider a consensus rule change (fork) to block miners from including large op-return transactions.",
"sig": "eb805555868f93ddb69d87ae7c46eea8e8c33f9d567dd4e3dd63c0790d99f35768392d1da9427b284a53a1ed94812f8166ebc58756a8d422eea9892765373736"
}