Rusty Russell [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-11-24 📝 Original message: Anthony Towns <aj at ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-11-24
📝 Original message:
Anthony Towns <aj at erisian.com.au> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:05:46PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> With the segregated witness proposal, introducing new opcodes is easy,
>> so maybe someone would find a reason to prefer open-coding it like this?
>
> I don't follow how segregated witness makes new opcodes any easier?
I didn't either, and that's because it's slightly orthogonal.
The proposal I heard is that the first byte of SW script is a version
byte, and if you don't understand that version, the script succeeds.
Cheers,
Rusty.
Published at
2023-06-09 12:45:04Event JSON
{
"id": "cb103ae1ef61bd03b66d1acadb9a1c2843daba1ee9e8afe0c7c44cec733f0d95",
"pubkey": "13bd8c1c5e3b3508a07c92598647160b11ab0deef4c452098e223e443c1ca425",
"created_at": 1686314704,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"ebf410166f334c23aa8c4463788497d09c02fc7a472b5ea556de811c6970ae8b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"af9784ffa03841f930fbf34aad230212394d5ef0ee23649f7c409b65bf87aaff",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"f0feda6ad58ea9f486e469f87b3b9996494363a26982b864667c5d8acb0542ab"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-11-24\n📝 Original message:\nAnthony Towns \u003caj at erisian.com.au\u003e writes:\n\u003e On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:05:46PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:\n\u003e\u003e With the segregated witness proposal, introducing new opcodes is easy,\n\u003e\u003e so maybe someone would find a reason to prefer open-coding it like this?\n\u003e\n\u003e I don't follow how segregated witness makes new opcodes any easier?\n\nI didn't either, and that's because it's slightly orthogonal.\n\nThe proposal I heard is that the first byte of SW script is a version\nbyte, and if you don't understand that version, the script succeeds.\n\nCheers,\nRusty.",
"sig": "f0ef327bddc230cae0aa3084562f88b4969bfe69fe3d670c2b9e311796967bd212723098c67000981600250c2f55f903f535125bd65314fad9c244f28ae0fdc2"
}