Event JSON
{
"id": "cb072c6f080da0dcafe76bf9f762a452d3cfe21b95744224d82da16db042f3ea",
"pubkey": "0aa39e5aef99a000a7bdb0b499158c92bc4aa20fb65931a52d055b5eb6dff738",
"created_at": 1731060746,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"39be441eefdee95d90a7be96214e850bd1802f116a325adcdc248d90087a8bd9",
"wss://purplerelay.com/",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"39be441eefdee95d90a7be96214e850bd1802f116a325adcdc248d90087a8bd9",
"wss://purplerelay.com/",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"f728d9e6e7048358e70930f5ca64b097770d989ccd86854fe618eda9c8a38106",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"client",
"noStrudel",
"31990:266815e0c9210dfa324c6cba3573b14bee49da4209a9456f9484e5106cd408a5:1686066542546"
]
],
"content": "it's better in pretty much every way, the only drawback of wireguard is that it only works over UDP, so you can't run it over some proxies *cough* Tor *cough*\n(but, apparently mullvad has their own workaround for this https://mullvad.net/en/blog/introducing-wireguard-over-tcp-and-ipv6 as well as shadowsocks support https://mullvad.net/en/blog/introducing-shadowsocks-obfuscation-for-wireguard which i think can also work around that)",
"sig": "379337ec8222e3cd52e21ee6bd6f5a0fd70dbd268d0408dd962d851fb17e02c77557853298dfaf09b422f2b82b0ac07ffbb8881b5262d5aeea0867597766ec26"
}