š
Original date posted:2015-02-02
š Original message:On 02/02/15 15:17, Andreas Schildbach wrote:
> Yes, except that BIP32-hierarchy and BIP44 differ in some requirements
> (e.g. gap limit).
Right.
To me it seems more important to describe how addresses should be
discovered (i.e. to scan xpub/0/i and xpub/1/j chains using gap limit G)
instead of how the xpub was created/obtained (bip32 vs bip44).
What do you thing about changing ?h=bip32 to something like
?t=01&g=20
- t=01 meaning that chains 0 and 1 should be scanned (feel free to
change "01" into any other descriptive string)
- g=20 meaning that gap 20 should be used
> Those strings are not meant to be read by humans. YYYYMMDD is more
> complicated than necessary, given that Bitcoin deals with seconds since
> epoch everywhere.
OK :-)
--
Best Regards / S pozdravom,
Pavol Rusnak <stick at gk2.sk>
Pavol Rusnak [ARCHIVE] /
npub1wcā¦3hnuq
2023-06-07 15:29:26
in reply to nevent1qā¦52ed
Author Public Key
npub1wccnjljxnarlx564vuc37hmuzuffurljevjnmuq4u0vjmh7e933sn3hnuqPublished at
2023-06-07 15:29:26Event JSON
{
"id": "cb6d408d0670f51a3b5529111091a9db92f457f18c70b3eeb65bd95437fec025",
"pubkey": "7631397e469f47f3535567311f5f7c17129e0ff2cb253df015e3d92ddfd92c63",
"created_at": 1686151766,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"da5dfa7015ad7eb23fb699400b79b743db94aa85c8d6df42489b5ad471f64cea",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"c224f91ab8cbb2e607f25ca00d5001676ae5a280d09d60135f83003765c370bb",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"3215b3d77dff1f84eeb5ad46fb1206a8d1657b3ea765a80b5489ece3a702d2bc"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2015-02-02\nš Original message:On 02/02/15 15:17, Andreas Schildbach wrote:\n\u003e Yes, except that BIP32-hierarchy and BIP44 differ in some requirements\n\u003e (e.g. gap limit).\n\nRight.\n\nTo me it seems more important to describe how addresses should be\ndiscovered (i.e. to scan xpub/0/i and xpub/1/j chains using gap limit G)\ninstead of how the xpub was created/obtained (bip32 vs bip44).\n\nWhat do you thing about changing ?h=bip32 to something like\n\n?t=01\u0026g=20\n\n- t=01 meaning that chains 0 and 1 should be scanned (feel free to\nchange \"01\" into any other descriptive string)\n- g=20 meaning that gap 20 should be used\n\n\u003e Those strings are not meant to be read by humans. YYYYMMDD is more\n\u003e complicated than necessary, given that Bitcoin deals with seconds since\n\u003e epoch everywhere.\n\nOK :-)\n\n-- \nBest Regards / S pozdravom,\n\nPavol Rusnak \u003cstick at gk2.sk\u003e",
"sig": "7a8c368b58fc3664264a3ec17ac4816943186be0bae2190000aca0c1626e01bc040a8ad283a7e46f00eccfaa33bc76e4cf86fa0af11913953adae13f82858508"
}