Austrian economists reject the use of advanced mathematics in economics primarily because they believe that economics is a social science, not a physical science. According to them, human action and decision-making are too complex, subjective, and context-dependent to be accurately modeled using mathematical equations. Here’s an explanation of their reasoning and how they justify their views:
Reasons for Rejecting Mathematics in Economics
1. Subjectivity of Human Action:
Austrian economics is based on praxeology, the study of human action. It assumes that humans act purposefully to achieve goals, guided by subjective values and preferences. Since these preferences vary between individuals and over time, they argue that human behavior cannot be reduced to objective, mathematical formulas.
2. Complexity of Social Phenomena:
Austrian economists argue that economic systems are far too complex to be captured by mathematical models. They believe that such models oversimplify reality, ignoring important qualitative aspects of human decision-making.
3. Knowledge is Dispersed and Local:
Economists like Friedrich Hayek emphasize the decentralized nature of knowledge in society. They argue that no central planner (or mathematical model) can fully capture the knowledge dispersed among millions of individuals.
4. False Precision:
Mathematical models give an illusion of precision and certainty, which Austrian economists consider dangerous. They argue that such models often rely on unrealistic assumptions, like perfect information or equilibrium, that do not reflect real-world conditions.
5. Non-repeatability of Historical Events:
Economics deals with unique, historical events rather than repeatable experiments. Austrians argue that mathematical models, which are better suited for controlled experiments, cannot account for the historical and contextual nature of economic phenomena.
#siamstr #btc #bitcoin #nostr