📅 Original date posted:2016-08-10
📝 Original message:I agree, audio-based transference isn't really great for a podcast or radio
ad. It could be used to transmit payment details between phones that don't
have cameras, though. I think it would be better to define a standard for
transmitting information over audio, but not define what information is to
be conveyed so people could use the method for sending pub keys, payment
protocol requests, or anything else developers might want to make use of.
I'm guessing some sort of data-over-audio standard already exists? In which
case the bip could just say "we use [standard] to convey any
bitcoin-related data".
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016, 10:55 Daniel Hoffman via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> thats how i thought it worked originally, but im not well versed on that,
> so i took his word for it
>
> On Aug 10, 2016 12:38 PM, "Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev" <
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
>> <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> > By sending a public seed, there's no way for someone to use the
>> transmitted
>> > address and trace the total amount of payments to it.
>>
>> Worse. By revealing a public seed, anyone who has seen it (= anyone
>> who ever pays you through it) can identity all payments to _any_
>> address derived from that seed.
>>
>> --
>> Pieter
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160810/115775e9/attachment-0001.html>;
James MacWhyte [ARCHIVE] /
npub12t…pye9h
2023-06-07 17:52:37
in reply to nevent1q…gq4u
Author Public Key
npub12tjaqer27049ejmvf0f3yd7kq6p93gg6ecavgrczge4rlzf59y5q2pye9hPublished at
2023-06-07 17:52:37Event JSON
{
"id": "cb98d3445d236dbf66a232b80c2e22c7d744726a82270d32af7aa52b20062c4e",
"pubkey": "52e5d0646af3ea5ccb6c4bd31237d6068258a11ace3ac40f02466a3f89342928",
"created_at": 1686160357,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"604e19cc7e558138181df75f429fcff5dc3df3f3c4572f74fca18823a74825ed",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"0875081d6bcd3b7a8f2f849b945eb8f946f41ad80243e55044a3f8962433ec8e",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"71d793f67ce7c8c4da90cbfad10881e288337b2dedc0433827bb726b16caed12"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2016-08-10\n📝 Original message:I agree, audio-based transference isn't really great for a podcast or radio\nad. It could be used to transmit payment details between phones that don't\nhave cameras, though. I think it would be better to define a standard for\ntransmitting information over audio, but not define what information is to\nbe conveyed so people could use the method for sending pub keys, payment\nprotocol requests, or anything else developers might want to make use of.\n\nI'm guessing some sort of data-over-audio standard already exists? In which\ncase the bip could just say \"we use [standard] to convey any\nbitcoin-related data\".\n\nOn Wed, Aug 10, 2016, 10:55 Daniel Hoffman via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e thats how i thought it worked originally, but im not well versed on that,\n\u003e so i took his word for it\n\u003e\n\u003e On Aug 10, 2016 12:38 PM, \"Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev\" \u003c\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e\u003e On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\u003e \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e \u003e By sending a public seed, there's no way for someone to use the\n\u003e\u003e transmitted\n\u003e\u003e \u003e address and trace the total amount of payments to it.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e Worse. By revealing a public seed, anyone who has seen it (= anyone\n\u003e\u003e who ever pays you through it) can identity all payments to _any_\n\u003e\u003e address derived from that seed.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e --\n\u003e\u003e Pieter\n\u003e\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160810/115775e9/attachment-0001.html\u003e",
"sig": "733e7dc9d9681295bba4bec830dfb5a3de3053d20129411b0f2e4e774827abe7513447a7757e6ac4e37af32d8772bd8c7f7565d6969c53962712388584d18851"
}