"Each DVM kind can have its own flow, NIP-90 flow is a suggestion, not a requirement."
This is basically why. There is no point in having a spec that is just a suggestion.
All I want is clarity, the current model is producing way too much confusion.
Deleting everything was meant as a first step only.
fiatjaf /
npub180…jh6w6
2025-05-02 10:23:34
in reply to nevent1q…j4ue
Author Public Key
npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6Published at
2025-05-02 10:23:34Event JSON
{
"id": "cbe03e39ddd2cb14fdfff638cb6bb7c2231f51953415dc22dd165e2cb907c9dd",
"pubkey": "3bf0c63fcb93463407af97a5e5ee64fa883d107ef9e558472c4eb9aaaefa459d",
"created_at": 1746181414,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"da18e9860040f3bf493876fc16b1a912ae5a6f6fa8d5159c3de2b8233a0d9851",
"",
"Dustin"
],
[
"e",
"639a62d47ad1687c7908da4e5c3b65d86bf59bfbebb8f5bec3d350ed85e74fac",
"",
"root",
"da18e9860040f3bf493876fc16b1a912ae5a6f6fa8d5159c3de2b8233a0d9851"
]
],
"content": "\"Each DVM kind can have its own flow, NIP-90 flow is a suggestion, not a requirement.\"\n\nThis is basically why. There is no point in having a spec that is just a suggestion.\n\nAll I want is clarity, the current model is producing way too much confusion.\n\nDeleting everything was meant as a first step only.",
"sig": "2ac28fcebcb62a3f931fb8b114044c5598b4b3367ea82f723ba74247a04230fad98690755faee86dd8668b74056ed0ca40b2b4c8bc35e418e11709d1ac705b38"
}