📅 Original date posted:2015-08-20
📝 Original message:Add:
For - If everyone agrees an increase is required at some point, The longer
you leave it the greater the numbers who have to upgrade
Against - Insufficient testing before moving to production ready releases
sets a bad precedent
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Elliot Olds via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Jorge Timón <
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> To be clear, these two are just my personal lists of arguments on
>> "each side" to clear my mind and try to be perfectly objective.
>> [...]
>> Here's the updated both-thread lists:
>>
>>
>> http://0bin.net/paste/igHZMgeoIbYjCJd9#ovaOUlSAKvQYT2p3VXuIuUmNk2XyLH-GnjR5NZMZgFb
>
>
> I thought this was a good idea, so I turned my personal notes into a site
> attempting to list all the strongest arguments and counterarguments on the
> block size debate. I made mine a bit more detailed.
>
> Here's the site: https://sites.google.com/site/bitcoinblocksizedebate/
>
> Feedback welcome.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150820/31894e56/attachment.html>;
Ahmed Zsales [ARCHIVE] /
npub105…lgz5a
2023-06-07 17:34:45
in reply to nevent1q…4087
Author Public Key
npub105eg2ny7gs448umtlsn4ns4slc5q3se8wpnzhtr22j8sgdrv2q7stlgz5aPublished at
2023-06-07 17:34:45Event JSON
{
"id": "c4e350baec48a0da65fc2e013fc00967c554e93ffd4a9a9ec6e73c632fb0becf",
"pubkey": "7d32854c9e442b53f36bfc2759c2b0fe2808c32770662bac6a548f04346c503d",
"created_at": 1686159285,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"84e9713c14b2ae748ca6ac2b1f01ce16f0b65e64045ea0382a18c035646dab80",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"5b25f72d97e9cd5286260ca645188d892c306264eb905b8e03b828d86e566eb5",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"d396d1d1039131d747d4a4794633e903ca371ae2156dfc8f411168aefa64d6d6"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-20\n📝 Original message:Add:\n\nFor - If everyone agrees an increase is required at some point, The longer\nyou leave it the greater the numbers who have to upgrade\n\nAgainst - Insufficient testing before moving to production ready releases\nsets a bad precedent\n\nOn Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Elliot Olds via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Jorge Timón \u003c\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e\u003e To be clear, these two are just my personal lists of arguments on\n\u003e\u003e \"each side\" to clear my mind and try to be perfectly objective.\n\u003e\u003e [...]\n\u003e\u003e Here's the updated both-thread lists:\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e http://0bin.net/paste/igHZMgeoIbYjCJd9#ovaOUlSAKvQYT2p3VXuIuUmNk2XyLH-GnjR5NZMZgFb\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e I thought this was a good idea, so I turned my personal notes into a site\n\u003e attempting to list all the strongest arguments and counterarguments on the\n\u003e block size debate. I made mine a bit more detailed.\n\u003e\n\u003e Here's the site: https://sites.google.com/site/bitcoinblocksizedebate/\n\u003e\n\u003e Feedback welcome.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150820/31894e56/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "b335df3c20b26fc51d882c3bcd319e1c605936b0072f496589829fd8721394ea8bf5a6ef4c37e237505d96831a1b6fd367babe3cb18c188442496500c786be47"
}