Xeno Kovah on Nostr: nprofile1q…kg90f nprofile1q…mdexn It is indeed possible that they continue to use ...

nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq6tx08mwy9vkkjen5s8ahy9e3x5z4dmykefvs7u6wex0s02puuskq6kg90f (nprofile…g90f) nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq47653442ud3e8z3l8c9zuz9m548pv0mxcwfn28d49fdkdyqx8sdqlmdexn (nprofile…dexn) It is indeed possible that they continue to use HCI even in the single chip architecture. However, within Espressif’s response (https://www.espressif.com/en/news/response_esp32_bluetooth) is the statement “If ESP32 is used in a standalone application and not connected to a host chip that runs a BLE host, the aforementioned HCI commands are not exposed and there is no security threat.”. And my interpretation of that is that the ESP32 can also be used in 2-chip architectures in which HCI is the interface, per the Tarlogic researchers’ implied architecture.