When he’s not busy being one of our best fiction writers, Ted Chiang has become our best critic of generative AI:
“The programmer Simon Willison has described the training for large language models as ‘money laundering for copyrighted data,’ which I find a useful way to think about the appeal of generative-A.I. programs: they let you engage in something like plagiarism, but there’s no guilt associated with it because it’s not clear even to you that you’re copying.”
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-weekend-essay/why-ai-isnt-going-to-make-art
James Gleick /
npub1gs…twxft
2024-08-31 20:32:50
Author Public Key
npub1gsqxlu3pj34alvqauqpvwflw7q7xgm3mmzyjp8vdz3u9vxde425qttwxftPublished at
2024-08-31 20:32:50Event JSON
{
"id": "cc9ecb82c9ccd891c6b67a9297fb4bca8b9fa6108babb1f3c60ca3f8f3454139",
"pubkey": "44006ff221946bdfb01de002c727eef03c646e3bd889209d8d14785619b9aaa8",
"created_at": 1725136370,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://mas.to/users/gleick/statuses/113058537194470078",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "When he’s not busy being one of our best fiction writers, Ted Chiang has become our best critic of generative AI:\n\n“The programmer Simon Willison has described the training for large language models as ‘money laundering for copyrighted data,’ which I find a useful way to think about the appeal of generative-A.I. programs: they let you engage in something like plagiarism, but there’s no guilt associated with it because it’s not clear even to you that you’re copying.”\n\nhttps://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-weekend-essay/why-ai-isnt-going-to-make-art",
"sig": "e40f3ed6969523d2f04f519a5a5986441fc4fdbd608aa5fa8b8d33a6e184e07a88168da2850a566d4776c1d5543123a42066525328ada253ded16f673ae76aa0"
}