š
Original date posted:2013-12-03
š Original message:>
> Wouldn't the idea be that the user always sees 10mBTC no matter what, but
> the receiver may receive less if the user decides to pay with a huge
> transaction?
>
If users want to pay with a huge transaction then it seems to me the user
should cover that cost. Allowing users to pay merchants with 100K
transactions full of dust and expecting them to eat the cost seems like a
great way to enable bleed-the-merchant-dry attacks.
RE: hiding or showing fees: I pointed out to Peter that there doesn't have
to be One True Answer. Let wallets experiment with either hiding or
exposing fees, and may the best user experience win.
--
--
Gavin Andresen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131203/59fe56b9/attachment.html>;
Gavin Andresen [ARCHIVE] /
npub1s4ā¦d44kw
2023-06-07 15:10:09
in reply to nevent1qā¦p7lj
Author Public Key
npub1s4lj77xuzcu7wy04afcr487f0r3za0f8n2775xrpkld2sv639mjqsd44kwPublished at
2023-06-07 15:10:09Event JSON
{
"id": "c69e7db9b0c77fb65c56438b2aa4b69e9043626bbdef19c0c40cb164b3519e7f",
"pubkey": "857f2f78dc1639e711f5ea703a9fc978e22ebd279abdea1861b7daa833512ee4",
"created_at": 1686150609,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"f082c8a0fa2ac5febf83583d19b2776fdb1875fb3ab2eae661676f17ee054405",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"891194154ceb3a48d954ce712d8a5ca085b1c1921c56db8a9aaeb4decc6b06c0",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2013-12-03\nš Original message:\u003e\n\u003e Wouldn't the idea be that the user always sees 10mBTC no matter what, but\n\u003e the receiver may receive less if the user decides to pay with a huge\n\u003e transaction?\n\u003e\n\nIf users want to pay with a huge transaction then it seems to me the user\nshould cover that cost. Allowing users to pay merchants with 100K\ntransactions full of dust and expecting them to eat the cost seems like a\ngreat way to enable bleed-the-merchant-dry attacks.\n\n\nRE: hiding or showing fees: I pointed out to Peter that there doesn't have\nto be One True Answer. Let wallets experiment with either hiding or\nexposing fees, and may the best user experience win.\n\n-- \n--\nGavin Andresen\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131203/59fe56b9/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "1fcd786fe25ef65da9f2d6b01047008a3c3a965654b6ff4da2567672a4ac8da446c9475ba80737b2e046c5aacbe97e60d26dfa116a5796cdb8450bd25656897e"
}