Event JSON
{
"id": "c6a9372988be2485321cdc6f1cc6772c1c51b526b1c19a8f4beba1266b9a4ae4",
"pubkey": "3b5cfa5901da20cbdde156de05d924297910d9a5d791f6693cce48072cd611a5",
"created_at": 1703412620,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"43d7c4ea3518ab0e604e97ac89e703d608b7e78536c31805e9b7347d83370577",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"b8de67a365b436ce300eb1049973026143f99e3d3712b326f302b7d6f49a2902",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"6919ff4b83a999fb6d9d8be9521c1be1134a73249260f12e173aad471a666ca8",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://c.im/users/TimWardCam/statuses/111634849526679222",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1g0tuf634rz4suczwj7kgnecr6cyt0eu9xmp3sp0fku68mqehq4msp3tvm4 Conventional wisdom when I was in the planning business was that if you discouraged business from investing in one place then yes, that was something you could do, but what you *couldn't* do was force it to move to the other place that you wanted it to.\n\nSo, this idea on a smaller scale was to discourage investment in Cambridge (by buggering around with planning policies) so that the economy of Fenland, not that many miles up the road, would be boosted. Which we thought was nonsense, because if a business couldn't locate in Cambridge we thought it'd look at Poona, the Riviera, Silicon Valley, ect ect, loooong before it considered Fenland.",
"sig": "aa4327701e3c5a739f69ec1834f1e64daccae35a787e072cb05704cc7f24f925c564d70aafaec5e2fae3e79010ebbda6fb5f6b6915f5abfeaeef34d8c9318c1c"
}