'With “growth” being both Starmer’s and Rachel Reeves’ watchword - rather than, say, redistribution - the imperative is on business to squeeze as much profit as possible out of workers.
Starmer’s parping about “shattering the class ceiling” is little more than a rhetorical gesture. We have one political party, the party of capital, distinguished only by two colours of rosette.'
Ash Sarkar
John Earle /
npub158…79ge0
2023-08-20 13:40:10
Author Public Key
npub158pe5ft9nznluejj407v06txd68s6xuk6dpxprtq9pj8mrjgpslqv79ge0Published at
2023-08-20 13:40:10Event JSON
{
"id": "ceac277f2e20655cffdd9d5caafc50100e1ee2a9fddc5cd494f2c73a1c0899c3",
"pubkey": "a1c39a256598a7fe6652abfcc7e9666e8f0d1b96d342608d6028647d8e480c3e",
"created_at": 1692538810,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.social/users/Skembear/statuses/110922223497981292",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "'With “growth” being both Starmer’s and Rachel Reeves’ watchword - rather than, say, redistribution - the imperative is on business to squeeze as much profit as possible out of workers. \n\nStarmer’s parping about “shattering the class ceiling” is little more than a rhetorical gesture. We have one political party, the party of capital, distinguished only by two colours of rosette.'\nAsh Sarkar",
"sig": "8ab4f22ce87f74cba1e0c463c95ac8e1e5f94b1d38794b775f4242ae68befce356bf15af570a491c7c169dc7521358ee9cb3246ae830758846026b1c9e56bd0a"
}