š
Original date posted:2021-03-18
š Original message:(IMO), where this proposal really excels, is mutlisig. And if you check my commits, it actually originally was for multisig only, and I extended it for multisig and single sig wallets.
ghost43 and Jochen Hoenicke brought up important issues with this proposed BIP re: single sig wallets, so I will be reverting this back for multisig derivations. I believe that should cover all concerns.
Please view the updated BIP here: https://github.com/Rspigler/bips-1/blob/Sane_Mulitisg_deriv/Modern%20Hierarchy%20for%20Deterministic%20Multisignature%20Wallets.mediawiki
And the updated PR here: https://github.com/Rspigler/bips-1/pull/1
Thank you,
Robert
Personal Fingerprint: BF0D 3C08 A439 5AC6 11C1 5395 B70B 4A77 F850 548F
āāāāāāā Original Message āāāāāāā
On Thursday, March 18, 2021 4:44 PM, Robert Spigler via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> I (Robert Spigler) will respond in a next post.
>
> Thanks for your comments!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20210318/eb5bd6d3/attachment.html>;
Robert Spigler [ARCHIVE] /
npub1jvā¦n4h4q
2023-06-07 18:30:46
in reply to nevent1qā¦5j8e
Author Public Key
npub1jvdxs20huh95a9c3870fexu3t9l75ewathejfupw26r7n3uh847shn4h4qPublished at
2023-06-07 18:30:46Event JSON
{
"id": "cebcd4518f7f2e9186d5055cf6119d7f8afa50375f21458294f04ebce28f6496",
"pubkey": "931a6829f7e5cb4e97113f9e9c9b91597fea65dd5df324f02e5687e9c7973d7d",
"created_at": 1686162646,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"913d86f3b70d7097b85745228f5bcf5ab314d109dd3d1e78a2db64c8151cf10d",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"f107d1fc01bbbd836cce2136d6c5ff6c043fd554bb0e9c6cb594fd4721a43389",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"931a6829f7e5cb4e97113f9e9c9b91597fea65dd5df324f02e5687e9c7973d7d"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2021-03-18\nš Original message:(IMO), where this proposal really excels, is mutlisig. And if you check my commits, it actually originally was for multisig only, and I extended it for multisig and single sig wallets.\n\nghost43 and Jochen Hoenicke brought up important issues with this proposed BIP re: single sig wallets, so I will be reverting this back for multisig derivations. I believe that should cover all concerns.\n\nPlease view the updated BIP here: https://github.com/Rspigler/bips-1/blob/Sane_Mulitisg_deriv/Modern%20Hierarchy%20for%20Deterministic%20Multisignature%20Wallets.mediawiki\n\nAnd the updated PR here: https://github.com/Rspigler/bips-1/pull/1\n\nThank you,\n\nRobert\n\nPersonal Fingerprint: BF0D 3C08 A439 5AC6 11C1 5395 B70B 4A77 F850 548F\n\nāāāāāāā Original Message āāāāāāā\nOn Thursday, March 18, 2021 4:44 PM, Robert Spigler via bitcoin-dev \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e I (Robert Spigler) will respond in a next post.\n\u003e\n\u003e Thanks for your comments!\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20210318/eb5bd6d3/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "d855c0fab15eea98496698252ad3eeefc4a4ae840c4fbe923d554f31f29f167b9dd4dce015be1487bcdc510d2e5526e5e6b834e741bbe1fdf2bce2de4bffa447"
}