Event JSON
{
"id": "c28004112afdac7e4eaa801e448d7c5ccb7114e79b6bcb1c9b3884f7b568dac7",
"pubkey": "9219392eba16af0205cd514827fa72f49a78964a70be2276e7f241e4ed4994e2",
"created_at": 1691329696,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"b05df304563277c34b62c29c188d256490f8208ddfef098d001c77d4d0b73e80",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"12da98a3a66fb47b43526b1b241e91df632bfd4058dc5364938dc932fe931118",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"c57163eb23aff04379e8cac148c17c61142bf45e5557601c0f731b7fe5466ba6",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://qoto.org/users/admitsWrongIfProven/statuses/110842982980995804",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1kpwlxpzkxfmuxjmzc2wp3rf9vjg0sgydmlhsnrgqr3maf59h86qqdxxzz4 Ah, a second way to view it: \nYou argue that workers should not be able to control the price point of their work. \nWell, if they cannot control this very thing they can sell, why would anyone get to own a lot more than that (a whole company), including the right to control how much is payed to workers? \n\nIf the answer is \"because it is like that\", we are in \"right of the strongest\" territory, and any union effort, even if it turns the whole society upside down, would have the same ethical validity.",
"sig": "e682c16fe1e457b6888f4f99ea52948dbb3942f2ebb3f6b2e2a5dbb64151209e2d8c37d730c0d003e2aeb8cbeeb3ee3027e7f9b1643b4ee21674cd897286cfcc"
}