📅 Original date posted:2015-07-24
📝 Original message:Yes that is completely doable for the next crawl, however I am not sure how much that reflects the behavior bitcoind would see when making connections. Nodes do not make any attempt to sync with close peers, which is an undesirable property if you are attempting to be sybil resistant. With some quick playing around it seems that you do get the expected speedup with close proximity, but it's not a particularly huge difference at present. I'll keep working on it and see where I get.
> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 at 4:48 AM
> From: "Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev" <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org>
> To: bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Node Speed Test
>
> You may see much better throughput if you run a few servers around the
> globe and test based on closest-by-geoip. TCP throughput is rather
> significantly effected by latency, though I'm not really sure what you
> should be testing here, ideally.
Slurms MacKenzie [ARCHIVE] /
npub168…hhm7q
2023-06-07 15:43:21
in reply to nevent1q…yq3l
Author Public Key
npub168j7xscxgv5tup3uxm0tpkktvc9ctzwuhj5szyhec3y4qwmrawaq9hhm7qSeen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-06-07 15:43:21Event JSON
{
"id": "c2e0198fd5b353b54160720bbca535d2f01f8aa44f925c91b297706afa786f38",
"pubkey": "d1e5e343064328be063c36deb0dacb660b8589dcbca90112f9c449503b63ebba",
"created_at": 1686152601,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"db0eb2204009a6b618d874147fda66733ace7abb340d9450e85ebe8e0a9d6b6a",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"7d18b80a3b3468a728a26e17f8e627530af49ab721f49322c3ab2111479953df",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"cd753aa8fbc112e14ffe9fe09d3630f0eff76ca68e376e004b8e77b687adddba"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-07-24\n📝 Original message:Yes that is completely doable for the next crawl, however I am not sure how much that reflects the behavior bitcoind would see when making connections. Nodes do not make any attempt to sync with close peers, which is an undesirable property if you are attempting to be sybil resistant. With some quick playing around it seems that you do get the expected speedup with close proximity, but it's not a particularly huge difference at present. I'll keep working on it and see where I get. \n\n\n\u003e Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 at 4:48 AM\n\u003e From: \"Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev\" \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e\n\u003e To: bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Node Speed Test\n\u003e\n\u003e You may see much better throughput if you run a few servers around the\n\u003e globe and test based on closest-by-geoip. TCP throughput is rather\n\u003e significantly effected by latency, though I'm not really sure what you\n\u003e should be testing here, ideally.",
"sig": "641f5f918d7b8aad400fb131ce1feb3f4f2eebfd112bb4c695d3c3bbb8db9c241835d3d68cf848a45102fe31f377d1bce49b3a683d235d9c60d3ee05d28c72d1"
}