Event JSON
{
"id": "c38b6819efdf1d2d861ea843a27f3121c1e95a09a95fa9eca2024b5a1c56fd89",
"pubkey": "2462942a02403077d230688a24198b22ee5d8628f2820ba34e751571a4257600",
"created_at": 1703530616,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"a63dc94f5143871e82fdf609dfd19cb9f24777ecb942335f4964e9b07498f906",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"98c6868f42e8c3b8b9f1a44277fe227992eb4ebf774087aff3efb5d1d531f095",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"fc410d80ff0524a631df04535653669e77065db4a4314666f6429f3da2eb9973",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://toad.social/users/BreadAndSalt/statuses/111642582504437429",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub15c7ujn63gwr3aqha7cyal5vuh8eywalvh9prxh6fvn5mqayclyrqnhy7pf I guess that depends on what you mean. “RCV” is a marketing term, not a technical one. Virtually all use of it refers specifically to IRV (or possibly STV in a multi seat context). I’ve not seen “RCV” used in reference to a Condorcet method, for example. “Ranked,” “ordinal” or “preference” method are more typical when talking about the general set of methods that use preference rankings. So I would say I do deny the value of RCV, but not all ranked methods.",
"sig": "d1082dbba822b9ce71df98745ef63580c2eb3d4e7c69b75fa15e6ebd7950ec849a2b8990d96d329368b374e5ac4972a77e3eefb8c321f1a430d70b7857d170fc"
}