Melvin Carvalho [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2013-04-24 📝 Original message:On 24 April 2013 09:42, ...

📅 Original date posted:2013-04-24
📝 Original message:On 24 April 2013 09:42, Mike Hearn <mike at plan99.net> wrote:

> HTML5 allows web apps to register themselves for handling URI schemes,
> such as the bitcoin: URI that is already in use and being extended as part
> of the payment protocol.
>
> The bad news is that for security reasons there is a whitelist of
> acceptable schemes in the spec:
>
>
> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/timers.html#dom-navigator-registerprotocolhandler
>
> The good news is that yesterday I talked to Hixie about it and he added
> bitcoin to the whitelist:
>
> http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=7849&to=7850
>
> I'm currently finding out what the process is for browser makers to notice
> the change (perhaps they watch the spec commit history and nothing needs to
> be done), but within a few months most users should have browsers that can
> accept bitcoin as a web-app handleable protocol scheme. I suppose IE10
> users may be the laggards, but I guess we can live with that for now.
>

This is great news for bitcon, and the IANA application will be improved if
there is evidence of it being used


>
> Ian pointed out some errors in the BIP21 spec. What's the process for
> amending the BIP? Do we need to create a new one and mark the old one as
> replaced, or can we just fix it in place given the relatively exotic nature
> of most of the issues? Here's his feedback:
>
>
> - BNF doesn't say what it's character set is (presumably it's Unicode)
>
> - "bitcoinparams" production doesn't define the separator, so in theory
> the syntax is ...?label=foomessage=fooother=foo (rather than
> ...?label=foo&message=foo etc)
>
> - the syntax allows ?amount=FOO&amount=1.1 as far as I can tell, since
> "otherparam" matches any name followed by any value, including "amount"
> followed by a bogus value.
>
> - "pchar" is referenced without definition.
>
> - the "simpler" syntax is just wrong (it would result in
> bitcoin:address?amount=1?label=FOO rather
> than bitcoin:address?amount=1&label=FOO)
>
> BTW the IETF URL specs are being obsoleted by http://url.spec.whatwg.org/,
> at least for Web purposes. In that case matters.
>

Not 100% sure how accurate this is, tho it may be the world view of some
folks in WHATWG. WHATWG is not a major standards body tho. Work on
improving the URL spec is always welcome, as it is the value proposition of
the Web.


>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
> New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service
> that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your
> browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic
> and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_apr
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20130424/46ad6cd9/attachment.html>;