Unhosted Marcellus on Nostr: > But some “fixes” could even backfire and create less fees, or introduce bugs, ...
> But some “fixes” could even backfire and create less fees, or introduce bugs, or damage the incentive structure
> Some soft forks like covenants can be thoughtfully considered for scaling and fee density
Couldn't this be one of these cases? If covenants allow moving a lot of the transactional volume offchain wouldn't this compromise the incentive of a fee market to form in the first place?
Published at
2023-09-06 13:12:49Event JSON
{
"id": "cf01d9006941b8dea0b535ad67f43dfbcdd525086c655e929602fad5775eebce",
"pubkey": "7bf7db83f73228f5df6ba34849f2af9fd54bf565b5ad698ac708249b310079a0",
"created_at": 1694005969,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"3d28ee7352751599b921c185c89918ecb120e67c46aaab563ddaac0d16588e52",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"eab0e756d32b80bcd464f3d844b8040303075a13eabc3599a762c9ac7ab91f4f"
]
],
"content": "\u003e But some “fixes” could even backfire and create less fees, or introduce bugs, or damage the incentive structure\n\n\u003e Some soft forks like covenants can be thoughtfully considered for scaling and fee density\n\n\nCouldn't this be one of these cases? If covenants allow moving a lot of the transactional volume offchain wouldn't this compromise the incentive of a fee market to form in the first place?",
"sig": "4d930e0641011cc70466cab12761a6d0f6e3d4a439ea69c7f69d85eca619954a08aaea7d0b56c8c88064348852094995220a6b40108828a870eb6f183fe2bd24"
}