📅 Original date posted:2016-06-24
📝 Original message:> Clearly the primary purpose of BIP0075 is to enshrine a DNSSEC protocol
> for giving wallet addresses memorable names.
>
>
I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not, but if you aren't, I don't
think this is an accurate description at all. BIP75 is, at its most
simplest, nothing more than an encrypted/encapsulated version of BIP70. All
we did was make it safe for people to exchange BIP70 messages through an
intermediary.
The only identity information included in BIP75 is the pki_data field,
which wasn't even introduced in BIP75--it was already in BIP70. I'm
guessing Peter would also have us remove BIP70 altogether?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160624/4fda853a/attachment.html>;
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PastedGraphic-1.tiff
Type: image/tiff
Size: 10972 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160624/4fda853a/attachment.tiff>;
James MacWhyte [ARCHIVE] /
npub12t…pye9h
2023-06-07 17:51:26
in reply to nevent1q…nrrx
Author Public Key
npub12tjaqer27049ejmvf0f3yd7kq6p93gg6ecavgrczge4rlzf59y5q2pye9hPublished at
2023-06-07 17:51:26Event JSON
{
"id": "cf673f4019b0bbe9f5e004045725c872a5092806e44cd485665e0476abb9364a",
"pubkey": "52e5d0646af3ea5ccb6c4bd31237d6068258a11ace3ac40f02466a3f89342928",
"created_at": 1686160286,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"a5039b46ff53fe0ad45fb1e565b7c7f05169b35d2126c2ee18198a6f3405f573",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"07a60134bbd79e552aae055d8717b6423ce9d58bafa4a4e0bd9a5051c262b8e6",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"22944ce1e29904e3826d25013a614e4665693ec514003efacc1b7586e8e5d0aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2016-06-24\n📝 Original message:\u003e Clearly the primary purpose of BIP0075 is to enshrine a DNSSEC protocol\n\u003e for giving wallet addresses memorable names.\n\u003e\n\u003e\nI can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not, but if you aren't, I don't\nthink this is an accurate description at all. BIP75 is, at its most\nsimplest, nothing more than an encrypted/encapsulated version of BIP70. All\nwe did was make it safe for people to exchange BIP70 messages through an\nintermediary.\n\nThe only identity information included in BIP75 is the pki_data field,\nwhich wasn't even introduced in BIP75--it was already in BIP70. I'm\nguessing Peter would also have us remove BIP70 altogether?\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160624/4fda853a/attachment.html\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: PastedGraphic-1.tiff\nType: image/tiff\nSize: 10972 bytes\nDesc: not available\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160624/4fda853a/attachment.tiff\u003e",
"sig": "3fe147fe045150606fccd2fb24325adfb5d1b63b499af2adafb3cf419ad873112e992c0e597cf4b4be91705585bcc97750e1fbb1ef5193afc495cf158cbe1121"
}