Sarah Fackrell on Nostr: This is another reason why all design patent decisions should include at least: (1) ...
This is another reason why all design patent decisions should include at least: (1) one representative image from each design patent-in-suit; and (2) at least one corresponding picture of each accused product.
Published at
2023-07-07 13:01:52Event JSON
{
"id": "ca4ce9467153d02664ce231d792f740a329ffe96a310d0c16810f04ba90cad3b",
"pubkey": "9eefd04d32ab5da8de12d7b83201578ea095a676acf3a692ec1b0b202ae4e16f",
"created_at": 1688734912,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"ff00bdc893858b6053d3eecdbb0378d4cc1091d8931b6127234f877dfdd29c0a",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"mostr",
"https://mastodon.social/users/design_law/statuses/110672931193142905"
]
],
"content": "This is another reason why all design patent decisions should include at least: (1) one representative image from each design patent-in-suit; and (2) at least one corresponding picture of each accused product.",
"sig": "4648ab07a9bf56ed79af27879815489cdb80b63b4ebf06e666b2e8f1a1084b9b175ca4eef5bfefefa9b8c7cdbf84d906758001f4e024ee2b82a7b551bba5f541"
}
