jaf Yeah, true, you can see active participants in the hashtag. But, to name a few, ...

Why Nostr? What is Njump?

:verified_2:防空識別區𝒔𝒐𝒄𝟶:redstar: /

npub1pf…hw9dh

2023-09-15 21:24:33

in reply to nevent1q…78th

jaf (npub1p5q…q5r0) Yeah, true, you can see active participants in the hashtag. But, to name a few, other than mastodon.art, off the top of my head: cathode.church, union.place, cosmick9.com, eldritch.cafe, artisan.chat, and the parties that comprise the "Oliphant" block-list oligarchy. The laughable part of the Oliphant block-list is how they claim it's "algorithmic" based on "consensus ", when, in practice, as soon as one of the maintainers adds anyone to that block-list, all the others follow suit, therefore immediately creating unanimity. These block-lists are promoted and advertised as being professionally maintained and independently vetted when they're absolutely not, and primarily (either due to market-share or culture) Mastodon instances widely subscribe---blindly---to these giant block-lists put together by other Mastodon instances. When talking about block-lists and #fediblock, this is genuinely a purely Mastodon behavior or phenomenon. They represent easily like 80% or more of the active participants therein. npub12wfyg7nljr8h25apv0c2fvqd2l5dcmdymc9d3x7zdy2xtzztaysq7f8kwl (npub12wf…8kwl) npub10ze7guqzj0kf8ayzzp605y2rwsczqny0afjyyt52fcl9nuttju2qahmjrr (npub10ze…mjrr)

Author Public Key

npub1pfec6wmfhajpjf2tw2hszyvy7kepx2x2f396td8zy35ufv3sr52q0hw9dh

Show more details

Published at

2023-09-15 21:24:33

Kind type

1 Short Text Note

Event JSON

{ "id": "ca4a5ecf1b0799e70ddfeb252eae7e7351b91f529ccdd49d396de81ba87f4f75", "pubkey": "0a738d3b69bf6419254b72af011184f5b21328ca4c4ba5b4e22469c4b2301d14", "created_at": 1694813073, "kind": 1, "tags": [ [ "p", "0d004f288d21bf3266f702e4d49d992f7281c5f34f1ebeceb555724649bb6abd", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "p", "5392447a7f90cf7553a163f0a4b00d57e8dc6da4de0ad89bc2691465884be920", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "p", "78b3e4700293ec93f4821074fa11437430204c8fea64422e8a4e3e59f16b9714", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "p", "16c19e6e50f04807261ee4ea3c3410f6ffd65cbb122e2d7e150c1b4ad98439be", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "p", "78749c6453b8bb9c77841d8c06a14248e80166c0e12de196cefa3ea7e603b427", "wss://relay.mostr.pub" ], [ "e", "af79c4827375bfbd4489f73d301e3b9efbecaf3fefcf443e38208bdd53db0905", "wss://relay.mostr.pub", "reply" ], [ "proxy", "https://soc0.outrnat.nl/notes/9joo99yil8", "activitypub" ] ], "content": "nostr:npub1p5qy72ydyxlnyehhqtjdf8ve9aegr30nfu0tan4424eyvjdmd27sg8q5r0 Yeah, true, you can see active participants in the hashtag. But, to name a few, other than mastodon.art, off the top of my head: cathode.church, union.place, cosmick9.com, eldritch.cafe, artisan.chat, and the parties that comprise the \"Oliphant\" block-list oligarchy. The laughable part of the Oliphant block-list is how they claim it's \"algorithmic\" based on \"consensus \", when, in practice, as soon as one of the maintainers adds anyone to that block-list, all the others follow suit, therefore immediately creating unanimity. These block-lists are promoted and advertised as being professionally maintained and independently vetted when they're absolutely not, and primarily (either due to market-share or culture) Mastodon instances widely subscribe---blindly---to these giant block-lists put together by other Mastodon instances. When talking about block-lists and #fediblock, this is genuinely a purely Mastodon behavior or phenomenon. They represent easily like 80% or more of the active participants therein. nostr:npub12wfyg7nljr8h25apv0c2fvqd2l5dcmdymc9d3x7zdy2xtzztaysq7f8kwl nostr:npub10ze7guqzj0kf8ayzzp605y2rwsczqny0afjyyt52fcl9nuttju2qahmjrr", "sig": "621c9ee3588657fc6e6dd3fcb3bc00063d8a9a6ebd4d0855b82207b4f7c896ca857e53e00d57ce3323ef327cb58a4f54c2759e0846d924218132f38bbdc7df8b" }