Wladimir [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2014-04-10 📝 Original message:On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at ...
📅 Original date posted:2014-04-10
📝 Original message:On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Tamas Blummer <tamas at bitsofproof.com>wrote:
> Serving headers should be default but storing and serving full blocks
> configurable to ranges, so people can tailor to their bandwith and space
> available.
>
I do agree that it is important.
This does require changes to the P2P protocol, as currently there is no way
for a node to signal that they store only part of the block chain. Also,
clients will have to be modified to take this into account. Right now they
are under the assumption that every full node can send them every
(previous) block.
What would this involve?
Do you know of any previous work towards this?
Wladimir
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140410/fb3a77bb/attachment.html>
Published at
2023-06-07 15:18:11Event JSON
{
"id": "c5391fb452ff82713fe000edd0471d101655e78504b262dc61b2ca70036c7a2e",
"pubkey": "30217b018a47b99ed4c20399b44b02f70ec4f58ed77a2814a563fa28322ef722",
"created_at": 1686151091,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"ed99a8ad47eb2c18db74cd3bd79e8fcc6fa95e61654848c6ab9c5bb9f7a7e8bf",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"6602403b95eec2586e320da135883cef3e6f83a7165d74f379763cfed946cf6a",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"c632841665fccdabf021322b1d969539c9c1f829ceed38844fea24e8512962d7"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-04-10\n📝 Original message:On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Tamas Blummer \u003ctamas at bitsofproof.com\u003ewrote:\n\n\u003e Serving headers should be default but storing and serving full blocks\n\u003e configurable to ranges, so people can tailor to their bandwith and space\n\u003e available.\n\u003e\n\nI do agree that it is important.\n\nThis does require changes to the P2P protocol, as currently there is no way\nfor a node to signal that they store only part of the block chain. Also,\nclients will have to be modified to take this into account. Right now they\nare under the assumption that every full node can send them every\n(previous) block.\n\nWhat would this involve?\n\nDo you know of any previous work towards this?\n\nWladimir\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140410/fb3a77bb/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "5edfc552f6089f3cbcada583f123ada10dc577655f285e1f964024e6686565ae569e94da4c240e65d546c5865e0e974b9c023c06f51523d7335f34c47f81815e"
}