📅 Original date posted:2012-11-06
📝 Original message:On Tuesday, November 06, 2012 7:56:23 PM slush wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Luke-Jr <luke at dashjr.org> wrote:
> > But more important to the success of BIP today, I think, is encouraging
> > wider community participation.
>
> It's not about BIP process, it's possibly about content of particular
> proposals.
> ...
> I promised to write BIP draft for Stratum, I proposed and implemented
> get_transactions method to allow Stratum jobs inspection. What more do you
> want, seriously? I'm soo tired by you, Luke.
Perhaps the problem lies in misunderstanding of the BIP process, then, rather
than awareness of it. BIP isn't just "write a document"; that's just the first
step. The main thing is that it gets peer review, changed to meet the
community's needs, and when done should result in a common standard suitable
to the needs of the whole community. Whatever the reason, there was a failure
of key members of the community to participate in the GBT BIP process and
ensure it addressed their needs/wants; identifying and addressing that is
something that would improve the BIP process.
get_transactions is a step in the right direction, and I don't think anyone
expects Stratum to reach the same level as GBT overnight considering it took
months for GBT (though I have no doubt now that the GBT discussions have taken
place, that some dedicated individual could probably combine the two if they
dedicated a few days to it). My comments, however, were not intended to bash
stratum or mere complain about the past (it can't be changed), but an attempt
to learn from the past and figure out how we can improve things the next time
around.
Luke
Luke-Jr [ARCHIVE] /
npub1dt…u7wrs
2023-06-07 10:38:16
in reply to nevent1q…lyc4
Author Public Key
npub1dtr22xd42nv07un2xq0rmtkqkjylgsmexau0anxxafa9xmmn2ncshu7wrsPublished at
2023-06-07 10:38:16Event JSON
{
"id": "c7c3b5870cba3527dac083fe313f1a4d9289b352f7907ef5f5d0471b626b3e82",
"pubkey": "6ac6a519b554d8ff726a301e3daec0b489f443793778feccc6ea7a536f7354f1",
"created_at": 1686134296,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"82f9b1249b3d2cf0bdcf5671c8f56ef657d4b72c60a51698198caef4636a88ed",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"e38a0861172f7b05fc90c03814219b2e2a61288d0a563a3d03d651446ba0876a",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"eb7ca795057ca7cabde6f541c741e661d013414934e5934c2e04c6677625c99a"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2012-11-06\n📝 Original message:On Tuesday, November 06, 2012 7:56:23 PM slush wrote:\n\u003e On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Luke-Jr \u003cluke at dashjr.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e But more important to the success of BIP today, I think, is encouraging\n\u003e \u003e wider community participation.\n\u003e \n\u003e It's not about BIP process, it's possibly about content of particular\n\u003e proposals.\n\u003e ...\n\u003e I promised to write BIP draft for Stratum, I proposed and implemented\n\u003e get_transactions method to allow Stratum jobs inspection. What more do you\n\u003e want, seriously? I'm soo tired by you, Luke.\n\nPerhaps the problem lies in misunderstanding of the BIP process, then, rather \nthan awareness of it. BIP isn't just \"write a document\"; that's just the first \nstep. The main thing is that it gets peer review, changed to meet the \ncommunity's needs, and when done should result in a common standard suitable \nto the needs of the whole community. Whatever the reason, there was a failure \nof key members of the community to participate in the GBT BIP process and \nensure it addressed their needs/wants; identifying and addressing that is \nsomething that would improve the BIP process.\n\nget_transactions is a step in the right direction, and I don't think anyone \nexpects Stratum to reach the same level as GBT overnight considering it took \nmonths for GBT (though I have no doubt now that the GBT discussions have taken \nplace, that some dedicated individual could probably combine the two if they \ndedicated a few days to it). My comments, however, were not intended to bash \nstratum or mere complain about the past (it can't be changed), but an attempt \nto learn from the past and figure out how we can improve things the next time \naround.\n\nLuke",
"sig": "39f49a45ceb9f694e53d304efc6c825e634691dd8991f063256af89ded02ad011ca0f088c1ad24b014593ec1f2e0d5a27cf8b185a7b5f0b53ea13a01d58eab02"
}