🔥Cassandra🔥 on Nostr: The time he was explaining something in class and I was confused so I emailed him ...
The time he was explaining something in class and I was confused so I emailed him later saying "wouldn't that be an example of a shield, not a sword?" (or vice versa) and IIRC he wrote back like "Oh! Yes! Thank you!" and then wrote an email to the entire class with a correction, credit to me.
The time he was telling me about some scholarship I could apply for (he could recommend me for?) and I said "no thank you, I have enough money right now" and I'm not sure I've ever seen a man look more surprised.
The time he was explaining some textbook case, which was officially interpreted as establishing ("discovering"?) some far-fetched legal distinction, but which, it seemed obvious to me, had more legal value as a demonstration of the maxim "judges hate women."
I wonder what he would have said if I'd made that comment out loud.
Published at
2025-05-24 12:42:16Event JSON
{
"id": "c7fe95cc694f86cbd6a5be76c5e39a079eb3babc99f98ddf5d3d0ca9c70d9cad",
"pubkey": "6de8c7851a45de42fd73b107cce61f50d461ee68b917ec647246f2b6d4d93dbe",
"created_at": 1748090536,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"content-warning",
"Today I'm thinking about: my Contracts professor"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://ottawa.place/users/Cassandra/statuses/114562861410156790",
"activitypub"
],
[
"client",
"Mostr",
"31990:6be38f8c63df7dbf84db7ec4a6e6fbbd8d19dca3b980efad18585c46f04b26f9:mostr",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
]
],
"content": "The time he was explaining something in class and I was confused so I emailed him later saying \"wouldn't that be an example of a shield, not a sword?\" (or vice versa) and IIRC he wrote back like \"Oh! Yes! Thank you!\" and then wrote an email to the entire class with a correction, credit to me.\n\nThe time he was telling me about some scholarship I could apply for (he could recommend me for?) and I said \"no thank you, I have enough money right now\" and I'm not sure I've ever seen a man look more surprised.\n\nThe time he was explaining some textbook case, which was officially interpreted as establishing (\"discovering\"?) some far-fetched legal distinction, but which, it seemed obvious to me, had more legal value as a demonstration of the maxim \"judges hate women.\"\n\nI wonder what he would have said if I'd made that comment out loud.",
"sig": "13890e4a4b7e377f4857ad45d0b895bbafb2876cae4f8d3e0e62e31a74a7e5afd2042640adc498563f91a511ed7435e70e2559f8ac50e1b806e00a292dae5e0a"
}