I like this statement:
1. If we don’t make BTC self-custody and private payments easier and more scalable, we’ll end up with dominant BTC custodians and payment providers.
But don’t understand how they are helping with it?
It seems to me that they are actually interested in further points like BTC DeFi, and L2 bridges 🤷
Hynek
npub1lz…hh86s
2025-01-10 13:39:04
in reply to nevent1q…n62x
Author Public Key
npub1lz8xv2dnyryrk4vswkcgf52vqqzruqwuyp53s7pvusx4fef9fh2s7hh86sPublished at
2025-01-10 13:39:04Event JSON
{
"id": "c7dc83477cb32ffb318e53897be3ca207f1cabc0e8cfa087555f701ce695b1c4",
"pubkey": "f88e6629b320c83b559075b084d14c00043e01dc206918782ce40d54e5254dd5",
"created_at": 1736516344,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"5541e5ad9b0b5ce3e661b9c1c5a529505a00bde32edd3d6c2332728223b5048d",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"2183e94758481d0f124fbd93c56ccaa45e7e545ceeb8d52848f98253f497b975"
]
],
"content": "I like this statement:\n1. If we don’t make BTC self-custody and private payments easier and more scalable, we’ll end up with dominant BTC custodians and payment providers.\n\nBut don’t understand how they are helping with it?\n\nIt seems to me that they are actually interested in further points like BTC DeFi, and L2 bridges 🤷",
"sig": "477216e13d7e8617cc694e197d31b5c8d9287402500106745b86dc326dd637bc86f8af933de2a67e7f77a8a6f9f06d4cfe3628b4dd97678d51f2a34c368d1226"
}