📅 Original date posted:2012-10-21
📝 Original message:> Any objections from other transaction-validating implementations?
Sounds good to me. I think it's important to give people a chance to fix
their software, but Pieter's proposal does that.
On 10/21/2012 7:05 PM, Gavin Andresen wrote:
> Any objections from other transaction-validating implementations?
>
> I strongly support more precisely defining the transaction validity
> rules by changing the reference implementation.
>
Stefan Thomas [ARCHIVE] /
npub1f8…ap20e
2023-06-07 10:36:55
in reply to nevent1q…4a5n
Author Public Key
npub1f8c8h5evqyy29yp6p7jelyzw6vfwp6jz05exn66l4ygwkj57ytzqmap20eSeen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-06-07 10:36:55Event JSON
{
"id": "b1087d9dc515d1c4503c3d00b3ef57179e0b5f86bc37340d7d5350e55e77531c",
"pubkey": "49f07bd32c0108a2903a0fa59f904ed312e0ea427d3269eb5fa910eb4a9e22c4",
"created_at": 1686134215,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"e6aa7fbaaa7e7d74d5666350a27b91ddee9c36dc79c3f6a87c5fb48a932331ef",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"434ce743f98c204b3dc65704a2455efa84a0bf1af4f739db22d72d675c7d7bdf",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2012-10-21\n📝 Original message:\u003e Any objections from other transaction-validating implementations?\n\nSounds good to me. I think it's important to give people a chance to fix\ntheir software, but Pieter's proposal does that.\n\nOn 10/21/2012 7:05 PM, Gavin Andresen wrote:\n\u003e Any objections from other transaction-validating implementations?\n\u003e\n\u003e I strongly support more precisely defining the transaction validity\n\u003e rules by changing the reference implementation.\n\u003e",
"sig": "73829090823a31e0a42d2c7a929baebc9dd1235a0b5f0dcdd43dd4765392bb1d2a3a22e5ea0ba866223226400e74d55cb6af62c7c8e49c88e9985e596d4b239c"
}