I really like Aqua's way of handling lightning. It reminds me of Muun, but the use of Liquid instead of main-chain makes it more affordable.
However, I don't see it as a (hot) spending wallet.
Liquid->LN costs too much for the coffee use case. A 4100 sat invoice (2€) requires ~400 sats in fees (0.2€). That's 10%.
However, it's a great stacking warm wallet, while a custodial well-connected LSP (WoS, or a good mint) can be the spending wallet.
ODT / ⚡ODT⚡
npub1uw…wkpsa
2024-02-26 14:33:13
in reply to nevent1q…edzp
Author Public Key
npub1uw5r5zph90dmvckkus2leadcqhhhhjctywrezt9d4kwhtvftnfuquwkpsaPublished at
2024-02-26 14:33:13Event JSON
{
"id": "b13917bc5624270ae397eebc0404921c54ce98c4df690efe671a724457959691",
"pubkey": "e3a83a08372bdbb662d6e415fcf5b805ef7bcb0b2387912cadad9d75b12b9a78",
"created_at": 1708957993,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"adc825e3638c154eac75545ff2f5083605c6c1873d526856f0e6f2f3eac441ea",
"wss://relay.damus.io/",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"ecbe372132a9323b813eeb48f8dfcedaeca00e2887af181b063c6cfa13ed8ea1"
]
],
"content": "I really like Aqua's way of handling lightning. It reminds me of Muun, but the use of Liquid instead of main-chain makes it more affordable. \nHowever, I don't see it as a (hot) spending wallet.\nLiquid-\u003eLN costs too much for the coffee use case. A 4100 sat invoice (2€) requires ~400 sats in fees (0.2€). That's 10%.\nHowever, it's a great stacking warm wallet, while a custodial well-connected LSP (WoS, or a good mint) can be the spending wallet. \n",
"sig": "edf0d083cfe893df85bba51445709252a27f601be61c21fb96427af8643d2058b0e2712d724da02b7fe50961bd4c62039fcafe080988d1040e4a58354a78fffd"
}