npub1ahr266p3p02mhcn5lcy06gnflphey4ardz5weh4s85eq5etm2vfqrtm294 (npub1ahr…m294) npub1tj4dr39uyr29xwzjrkgnqm7prk2wez60rhwfle7gwgfdh69m334q6lzh8f (npub1tj4…zh8f) Ah, now that’s a different thing. I have also seen a lot of both pro- and anti-AI stuff that obviously has other axes to grind. I tend to find the MIT Technology Review, which published the article I shared, has a fairly balanced approach. It doesn’t shy away from the problematic issues with AI, but nor does it seem to have a hidden agenda. I haven’t studied the publication closely, however, so there may be something I’ve missed.
As for the total carbon footprint of AI: I would agree that of the many problematic issues with the technology, that is not the most important. But in this day of climate crisis: anything that increases our carbon footprint is problematic, and we should be factor this in when using any technology that leads to a net increase of CO2 emissions.
/2
Fredrik Graver /
npub175…9wlvw
2023-12-05 16:28:35
in reply to nevent1q…tgcr
Author Public Key
npub1755rvw4qajvw7udnh7jmzq4jru0gsjnh4m9gwy4ajfed90casaksg9wlvwPublished at
2023-12-05 16:28:35Event JSON
{
"id": "b27286f3fe400891e7812f32ecefd0fd8a938b7beab41b6814f641cbaa24d0eb",
"pubkey": "f528363aa0ec98ef71b3bfa5b102b21f1e884a77aeca8712bd9272d2bf1d876d",
"created_at": 1701793715,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"edc6ad68310bd5bbe274fe08fd2269f86f9257a368a8ecdeb03d320a657b5312",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"5caad1c4bc20d45338521d91306fc11d94ec8b4f1ddc9fe7c87212dbe8bb8c6a",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"fed3de3dfef44fe3c5703a89667d546e199c388a8577bf6e082f4ac3aa47c462",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"3f3f3a3d92e3cc808b6fa7eb826e59fcc3b344c66fac5661bfdc822c118dc332",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"00334238bccde6722a73ac324b8767d282919b0e0efc9beafca1061e906c1611",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://hcommons.social/users/fgraver/statuses/111528752914594397",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1ahr266p3p02mhcn5lcy06gnflphey4ardz5weh4s85eq5etm2vfqrtm294 nostr:npub1tj4dr39uyr29xwzjrkgnqm7prk2wez60rhwfle7gwgfdh69m334q6lzh8f Ah, now that’s a different thing. I have also seen a lot of both pro- and anti-AI stuff that obviously has other axes to grind. I tend to find the MIT Technology Review, which published the article I shared, has a fairly balanced approach. It doesn’t shy away from the problematic issues with AI, but nor does it seem to have a hidden agenda. I haven’t studied the publication closely, however, so there may be something I’ve missed.\n\nAs for the total carbon footprint of AI: I would agree that of the many problematic issues with the technology, that is not the most important. But in this day of climate crisis: anything that increases our carbon footprint is problematic, and we should be factor this in when using any technology that leads to a net increase of CO2 emissions.\n\n/2",
"sig": "4bef6f58328659648356da16be0a13952c28c4b5e53008d08edd4a8f9b3f743be2bf3efb95e0d4f76b68c72c0c753128954715f9642ab65875adbc4f5ac309f5"
}