📅 Original date posted:2015-06-10
📝 Original message:On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 02:00:27PM -0600, Nathan Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Aaron Voisine <voisine at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > It could be done by agreeing on a data format and encoding it in an
> > op_return output in the coinbase transaction. If it catches on it could
> > later be enforced with a soft fork.
> >
> >
> Sounds plausible, except SPV protocols would need to include this coinbase
> txn if it's going to help SPV clients. (Until a softfork is activated, SPV
> clients should not rely on this encoding, since until that time the results
> can be fabricated by individual miners.)
Fee stats can always be fabricated by individual miners because fees can
be paid out-of-band.
--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000001245bd2f5c99379ee76836227ded9c08324894faabc0d27f
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 650 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150610/d361662b/attachment.sig>;
Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] /
npub1m2…a2np2
2023-06-07 15:37:17
in reply to nevent1q…lz97
Author Public Key
npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2Published at
2023-06-07 15:37:17Event JSON
{
"id": "b204bfa22a9c4ae775278f2b738ed40bd46f7f25f1fce4a961b40b1036989de9",
"pubkey": "daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa",
"created_at": 1686152237,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"e5c5b327043fce5d06c04d5d47b9e1bc42816638599cdc94c838afd2a20dc49c",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"255ab2d833ec17556b6c66aa2cb39eda5c86f8ef1c42c829898a29fcecc1a18e",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"523c0d5379d2d258d92dab5f63a52d60a8a6d34ce6d11f9c60c3f64b24727aaf"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-06-10\n📝 Original message:On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 02:00:27PM -0600, Nathan Wilcox wrote:\n\u003e On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Aaron Voisine \u003cvoisine at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \n\u003e \u003e It could be done by agreeing on a data format and encoding it in an\n\u003e \u003e op_return output in the coinbase transaction. If it catches on it could\n\u003e \u003e later be enforced with a soft fork.\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e Sounds plausible, except SPV protocols would need to include this coinbase\n\u003e txn if it's going to help SPV clients. (Until a softfork is activated, SPV\n\u003e clients should not rely on this encoding, since until that time the results\n\u003e can be fabricated by individual miners.)\n\nFee stats can always be fabricated by individual miners because fees can\nbe paid out-of-band.\n\n-- \n'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n00000000000000001245bd2f5c99379ee76836227ded9c08324894faabc0d27f\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 650 bytes\nDesc: Digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150610/d361662b/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "45a1dff32cf33595afe3a0a995ec9429eb1cbbf5680f3e9573a387d790bee9901d4793cbc2e3bffd281cd9a51c1a43fc6fc7c9dd8239db2df990a20b64da2733"
}