š
Original date posted:2016-09-22
š Original message:On Thursday, 22 September 2016 21:59:12 CEST Jonas Schnelli via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> Hi Tom
>
> > I think you misunderstand tagged systems at a very basic level. You
> > think that html can only use a bold tag <b> once in a document? Thats
> > equivalent to what you are saying.
>
> Would the "additional" segment contain the same amount of
> nSequence-equivalent token as the number of inputs in the "inputs"
> segment?
At this point I don't know what it should look like, I have not had time to
look deeply into BIP68. Is this what you would suggest it to look like?
I rather figured spending limitations would be assigned to an output, not
an input.
> However, I think that should be mentioned/specified in the BIP.
It can be, and likely should be. This BIP doesn't pretend to be finished
yet.
I welcome any and all discussion about this, it only serves to make the end
result stronger!
Tom [ARCHIVE] /
npub1h3ā¦8z4k5
2023-06-07 17:53:30
in reply to nevent1qā¦43hj
Author Public Key
npub1h394c0pkdum0jw4rufslt3ur9m9c2ym4x7a0t68spfpjr6zlq3msu8z4k5Published at
2023-06-07 17:53:30Event JSON
{
"id": "b3684a591e699cbc68e89e183845fbc167eee61c4273bb3b4d2493b6d85a0571",
"pubkey": "bc4b5c3c366f36f93aa3e261f5c7832ecb85137537baf5e8f00a4321e85f0477",
"created_at": 1686160410,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"1a569d98e0e6ce5c9d61181fddad681419ffdb691b73a42ccb4919035df06596",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"21c884f6c94478b7a152d4f29d4bc802d071e97396d354d857af07a3b966bc56",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"9a463e0fab8963b013698c15a0f2449d19c97f3b88458e5874095b5006df9a0c"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2016-09-22\nš Original message:On Thursday, 22 September 2016 21:59:12 CEST Jonas Schnelli via bitcoin-dev \nwrote:\n\u003e Hi Tom\n\u003e \n\u003e \u003e I think you misunderstand tagged systems at a very basic level. You\n\u003e \u003e think that html can only use a bold tag \u003cb\u003e once in a document? Thats\n\u003e \u003e equivalent to what you are saying.\n\u003e \n\u003e Would the \"additional\" segment contain the same amount of\n\u003e nSequence-equivalent token as the number of inputs in the \"inputs\"\n\u003e segment?\n\nAt this point I don't know what it should look like, I have not had time to \nlook deeply into BIP68. Is this what you would suggest it to look like?\nI rather figured spending limitations would be assigned to an output, not \nan input.\n\n\u003e However, I think that should be mentioned/specified in the BIP.\n\nIt can be, and likely should be. This BIP doesn't pretend to be finished \nyet.\n\nI welcome any and all discussion about this, it only serves to make the end \nresult stronger!",
"sig": "d517d5fb42e0e5ed8cdea35b83526b6f307ddd7c1824309685136bbf92d505ee7672d672a4b270a810199b350d1dad159a68580c645c242d340d57924978fe16"
}